• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Effects of antianxiety and antipsychotic drugs on DRL responding for brain stimulation.

作者信息

Ichimaru Y, Moriyama M, Gomita Y

出版信息

Life Sci. 1983 Jan 31;32(5):437-48. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(83)90136-4.

DOI:10.1016/0024-3205(83)90136-4
PMID:6130461
Abstract

Satiated rats could be trained to give stable rates of responding for rewarding stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus delivered on differential reinforcement of low rate (DRL) schedule requiring 2 to 8 sec interresponse intervals for reinforcement (DRL-2 to 8). The performance on a DRL-8 schedule was tested 30 min after the oral administration of benzodiazepines. Diazepam (5 and 10 mg/kg) and meprobamate (200 mg/kg) caused significant increases in response rates during the first 5 min of a session, but not thereafter. Bromazepam (1 and 5 mg/kg) also caused a significant increase in the rates during the first and second 5 min. On the other hand, chlorpromazine (20 mg/kg) caused no effect in the first 5 min but decrease in second and third 5 min. These results indicate that DRL schedules with a brain stimulation reward provided a useful tool for evaluation of antianxiety drugs. The advantage of the brain stimulation reward over food reward is that the possible effects of the drugs on hunger motivation need not be considered.

摘要

相似文献

1
Effects of antianxiety and antipsychotic drugs on DRL responding for brain stimulation.
Life Sci. 1983 Jan 31;32(5):437-48. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(83)90136-4.
2
Behavioral suppression using intracranial reward and punishment: effects of benzodiazepines.使用颅内奖赏与惩罚的行为抑制:苯二氮䓬类药物的作用
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1984 Nov;21(5):773-8. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(84)80018-0.
3
"Conflict" situation based on intracranial self-stimulation behavior and the effect of benzodiazepines.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1981 Feb;14(2):219-22. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(81)90246-x.
4
Effects of anxiolytic drugs on escape behavior induced by dorsal central gray stimulation in rats.抗焦虑药物对大鼠背侧中央灰质刺激诱发的逃避行为的影响。
Physiol Behav. 1991 Jan;49(1):125-9. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(91)90242-g.
5
Use of DRL in differentiating anxiolytic and neuroleptic properties of CNS drugs.DRL在区分中枢神经系统药物的抗焦虑和抗精神病特性中的应用。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1977 May;6(5):591-3. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(77)90122-8.
6
A sensitive and selective monkey conflict test.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1982 Oct;17(4):645-9. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(82)90338-0.
7
[Effects of anxiolytic drugs on rewarding and aversive behaviors induced by intracranial stimulation].[抗焦虑药物对颅内刺激诱发的奖赏和厌恶行为的影响]
Nihon Shinkei Seishin Yakurigaku Zasshi. 2004 Jun;24(3):111-8.
8
Specificity of effects of chronically administered diazepam on the responding of rats under two different spaced-responding schedules.
Behav Pharmacol. 2000 Feb;11(1):45-55. doi: 10.1097/00008877-200002000-00005.
9
Effects of drugs on response duration differentiation. VI: differential effects under differential reinforcement of low rates of responding schedules.药物对反应持续时间分化的影响。VI:低反应率强化程序下的差异效应。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997 Jun;281(3):1368-80.
10
Effects of various drugs including organophosphorus compounds (OPC) and therapeutic compounds against OPC on DRL responding.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1998 Apr;59(4):1069-80. doi: 10.1016/s0091-3057(97)00519-4.