Greenblatt D J, Divoll M
Adv Neurol. 1983;34:487-91.
Eight healthy volunteers received single intravenous doses of diazepam and lorazepam on two separate occasions. Kinetic parameters of drug distribution and clearance were determined by measurement of multiple plasma concentrations following each dose. Elimination half-life for diazepam averaged 51.2 hr, as compared with 15.7 hr for lorazepam. However, after correction for individual differences in protein binding (mean free fraction 1.5% for diazepam versus 10.1% for lorazepam), the volume of distribution of unbound diazepam (mean 133 liter/kg) was more than 10 times larger than that of lorazepam (mean 12 liter/kg). This is consistent with in vivo measurements of lipid solubility indicating that diazepam has a much larger octanol/water partition coefficient than lorazepam. Thus, the shorter duration of action of a single intravenous dose of diazepam as compared with lorazepam, despite the much longer half-life of diazepam, is explained by the more extensive tissue distribution of unbound diazepam.
八名健康志愿者在两个不同的时间分别接受了单次静脉注射地西泮和劳拉西泮。通过测量每次给药后的多个血浆浓度来确定药物分布和清除的动力学参数。地西泮的消除半衰期平均为51.2小时,而劳拉西泮为15.7小时。然而,在校正了蛋白质结合的个体差异后(地西泮的平均游离分数为1.5%,而劳拉西泮为10.1%),未结合地西泮的分布容积(平均133升/千克)比劳拉西泮(平均12升/千克)大10倍以上。这与体内脂溶性测量结果一致,表明地西泮的正辛醇/水分配系数比劳拉西泮大得多。因此,尽管地西泮的半衰期长得多,但单次静脉注射地西泮的作用持续时间比劳拉西泮短,这是由于未结合地西泮更广泛的组织分布所致。