Suppr超能文献

[心得安与心得静治疗劳力型心绞痛有效性的比较研究]

[Comparative study of the effectiveness of inderal and anaprilin in effort angina].

作者信息

Romakov A Iu, Kokurina E V, Vygodin V A, Desiatnichenko V M, Mazur N A

出版信息

Kardiologiia. 1983 Oct;23(10):76-82.

PMID:6139500
Abstract

A comparative assessment of antianginal effect of inderal and anaprilin in individually selected doses was made using bicycle ergometric tests, after a single administration of the drug or during a treatment course. Mean effective single doses of inderal and anaprilin were 66 and 78 mg, and daily doses, 252 and 308 mg, respectively, with no significant differences observed between the two drugs in terms of manifestation and duration of antianginal effect. The manifestation of antianginal effect of propranolol did not vary significantly in conditions of a single administration and a treatment course. Post-treatment exercise-related decrease in double product was much more sustained as compared to the antianginal effect duration, and therefore may not be used as a measure in the assessment of the duration of antianginal effect produced by beta-blockers.

摘要

采用自行车测力计试验,对单次给药后或治疗过程中按个体选择剂量的心得安和心得静的抗心绞痛效果进行了比较评估。心得安和心得静的平均有效单剂量分别为66毫克和78毫克,日剂量分别为252毫克和308毫克,两种药物在抗心绞痛效果的表现和持续时间方面未观察到显著差异。在单次给药和治疗过程中,普萘洛尔抗心绞痛效果的表现没有显著变化。与抗心绞痛效果持续时间相比,治疗后运动相关双乘积的下降更持久,因此不能用作评估β受体阻滞剂产生的抗心绞痛效果持续时间的指标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验