Peach H, Compston J E, Vedi S
Lancet. 1983 Dec 10;2(8363):1347-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)91102-9.
A questionnaire screening for osteomalacia was used to obtain histories from 53 consecutive Asian patients referred to a gastroenterology unit. 15 of the patients were found to have osteomalacia on subsequent histology. The questions that best distinguished between osteomalacic and non-osteomalacic patients were identified by discriminant analysis. These questions were used to derive discriminant functions by which a second sample of 45 Asian patients presenting to other parts of the National Health Service were classified as osteomalacic or non-osteomalacic. Bone histology showed false-negative and false-positive rates of 10% and 11%; the predictive value of the negative result was 97%. A short questionnaire would be a cheaper and more convenient method than biochemical screening for osteomalacia case-finding among Asian patients presenting to the NHS.
使用一份骨软化症筛查问卷,从53名连续转诊至胃肠病科的亚洲患者那里获取病史。后续组织学检查发现其中15名患者患有骨软化症。通过判别分析确定了最能区分骨软化症患者和非骨软化症患者的问题。利用这些问题得出判别函数,据此对向国民医疗服务体系其他部门就诊的45名亚洲患者的第二个样本进行分类,判断其为骨软化症患者或非骨软化症患者。骨组织学显示假阴性率和假阳性率分别为10%和11%;阴性结果的预测价值为97%。对于向国民医疗服务体系就诊的亚洲患者,一份简短问卷将是比生化筛查更便宜、更便捷的骨软化症病例发现方法。