Weippl G
Clin Ther. 1984;6(4):475-82.
In a five-day, randomized, double-blind study, the efficacy and safety of a syrup containing a combination of azatadine maleate, pseudoephedrine sulfate, and dextromethorphan hydrobromide (SCH 399 syrup) were compared with those of an expectorant containing the antihistamine diphenhydramine hydrochloride in 60 children with symptoms of the common cold and associated cough. One-half teaspoonful of assigned medication was administered three or four times daily. The severity of signs and symptoms was graded on days 0, 3, and 5. At days 3 and 5, patients treated with SCH 399 experienced a significantly greater degree of relief (P less than 0.001) than did patients treated with the expectorant product. Differences between treatment groups in overall therapeutic response, as evaluated by the physician, were statistically significant (P less than 0.001) at each visit, favoring patients treated with SCH 399. More than 75% of the patients treated with SCH 399 demonstrated an excellent therapeutic response. Tolerance to both study medications was excellent.
在一项为期五天的随机双盲研究中,对60名患有普通感冒及相关咳嗽症状的儿童,比较了含有马来酸氯苯那敏、硫酸伪麻黄碱和氢溴酸右美沙芬组合的糖浆(SCH 399糖浆)与含有抗组胺药盐酸苯海拉明的祛痰剂的疗效和安全性。每天三次或四次服用半茶匙指定药物。在第0、3和5天对体征和症状的严重程度进行分级。在第3天和第5天,接受SCH 399治疗的患者比接受祛痰剂产品治疗的患者症状缓解程度明显更大(P小于0.001)。经医生评估,各次就诊时治疗组在总体治疗反应上的差异具有统计学意义(P小于0.001),支持接受SCH 399治疗的患者。超过75%接受SCH 399治疗的患者表现出极佳的治疗反应。对两种研究药物的耐受性都很好。