Shukla G S, Singhal R L
Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1984 Aug;62(8):1015-31. doi: 10.1139/y84-171.
The number of reports concerning the chemical toxicology of metals which are released in the environment by natural as well as anthropogenic sources, have been increasing constantly. Lead, cadmium, and manganese have found a variety of uses in industry, craft, and agriculture owing to their physical and chemical properties. The environmental burden of heavy metals has been rising substantially by smelter emission in air and waste sewage in water. Further, organic compounds of lead and manganese used as antiknock substances in gasoline are emitted into the atmosphere by automobile exhaustion. Such environmental contamination of air, water, soil, and food is a serious threat to all living kinds. Although these metals are known to produce their toxic effects on a variety of body systems, much emphasis has been placed on their effects on the nervous system owing to apparent association of relatively low or "subclinical" levels of metallic exposure with behavioral and psychological disorders. Clinical and animal data on environmental exposure show that while lead and manganese are most toxic to the nervous system, cadmium exerts profound adverse effects on kidney and the male reproductive system. It appears that the consequences of exposure to lead in adults are less severe than the types of exposure associated with hyperactivity in neonates. Except for a few reports, hyperactivity has indeed been observed in animals exposed to either of these three metals. Experimental work has also shown that these metals produce behavioral changes by altering the metabolism of brain neurotransmitters, especially catecholamines. Recently, it is hypothesized that these metals exert their toxic effect by damaging biological defences which exist in the body to serve as protective mechanisms against exogenous toxins. A voluminous publication list with diverse opinions on the biological effects of metals is available and there is an urgent need to compile assessment of the existing literature to identify the future theme of research work. The problem of metal toxicity becomes even more complex owing to simultaneous or successive exposure of the general population to different physical, chemical, biological, and psychological factors in the environment. The net toxic manifestations produced by multiple exposure should, therefore, be different from those produced by a single factor as the result of their additive, synergistic or antagonistic action. Even though a metal may not exist in sufficient amounts to cause any disability, the toxicity could result when a second factor is also present.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
由自然和人为来源释放到环境中的金属化学毒理学相关报告数量一直在持续增加。铅、镉和锰因其物理和化学性质在工业、手工业和农业中有多种用途。通过空气中的冶炼厂排放和水中的污水,重金属的环境负担大幅上升。此外,汽油中用作抗爆物质的铅和锰的有机化合物通过汽车尾气排放到大气中。空气、水、土壤和食物的这种环境污染对所有生物构成严重威胁。尽管已知这些金属会对多种身体系统产生毒性作用,但由于相对较低或“亚临床”水平的金属暴露与行为和心理障碍明显相关,人们一直非常重视它们对神经系统的影响。关于环境暴露的临床和动物数据表明,虽然铅和锰对神经系统毒性最大,但镉对肾脏和男性生殖系统有深远的不良影响。似乎成年人接触铅的后果不如新生儿多动相关的接触类型严重。除了少数报告外,确实在接触这三种金属中的任何一种的动物身上观察到了多动。实验工作还表明,这些金属通过改变脑神经递质,尤其是儿茶酚胺的代谢来产生行为变化。最近,有人假设这些金属通过破坏体内作为抵御外源性毒素的保护机制而存在的生物防御来发挥其毒性作用。有大量关于金属生物效应的不同观点的出版物列表,迫切需要对现有文献进行汇编评估,以确定未来研究工作的主题。由于普通人群同时或相继接触环境中的不同物理、化学、生物和心理因素,金属毒性问题变得更加复杂。因此,多次接触产生的净毒性表现应与单一因素产生的不同,因为它们具有相加、协同或拮抗作用。即使一种金属的含量不足以导致任何残疾,但当第二种因素也存在时,可能会产生毒性。(摘要截取自400字)