Suppr超能文献

长期心电图记录检查技术的比较。

Comparison of techniques for examining long-term ECG recordings.

作者信息

Stein I M, Plunkett J, Troy M

出版信息

Med Instrum. 1980 Jan-Feb;14(1):69-72.

PMID:6153451
Abstract

The Holter superimposition method was compared with the Argus/H computer system and the Stein/Peterson frozen display technique in the analysis of 94 long-term ambulatory ECG recordings using technical staff experienced with each analysis procedure. The use of the Holter superimposition method resulted in a failure of detection of 33-66 percent of ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias as compared to the two other computer-based playback systems. The Argus/H system and the frozen display method of Stein and Peterson were comparable with respect to ventricular arrhythmia detection, but the frozen display method was superior to the Argus/H system with respect to the detection of supraventricular arrhythmias.

摘要

在对94份长期动态心电图记录进行分析时,将动态心电图叠加法与阿格斯/H计算机系统以及斯坦因/彼得森冻结显示技术进行了比较,参与分析的技术人员均熟悉每种分析程序。与其他两种基于计算机的回放系统相比,使用动态心电图叠加法导致室性和室上性心律失常的漏检率达33%至66%。在室性心律失常检测方面,阿格斯/H系统和斯坦因与彼得森的冻结显示法相当,但在室上性心律失常检测方面,冻结显示法优于阿格斯/H系统。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验