• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

退伍军人管理局失语症合作研究:个体治疗与团体治疗的比较

Veterans Administration cooperative study on aphasia: a comparison of individual and group treatment.

作者信息

Wertz R T, Collins M J, Weiss D, Kurtzke J F, Friden T, Brookshire R H, Pierce J, Holtzapple P, Hubbard D J, Porch B E, West J A, Davis L, Matovitch V, Morley G K, Resurreccion E

出版信息

J Speech Hear Res. 1981 Dec;24(4):580-94. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2404.580.

DOI:10.1044/jshr.2404.580
PMID:6173512
Abstract

Five Veterans Administration Medical Centers participated in an investigation designed to compare individual with group treatment for aphasic patients who had suffered a left hemisphere cerebral vascular accident. Patients who met selection criteria were assigned randomly to either traditional, individual, stimulus-response type treatment of specific language deficits or group therapy designed to improve communication through group interaction and discussion with no direct treatment of specific language deficits. All patients received eight hours of therapy each week beginning at four weeks postonset and continuing until 48 weeks postonset or until they dropped out of the study. A battery of language measures and a clinical neurologic evaluation were administered at intake and every 11 weeks a patient was in the study. Results show both individually and group-treated patients made significant improvement in language abilities. Individual treatment resulted in significantly better overall performance on the Porch Index of Communicative Ability; however, no significant differences were observed between groups on the other language measures. If the traditional belief is correct that significant spontaneous recovery is complete by three to six months postonset, significant improvement in both groups beyond 26 weeks postonset indicates both individual and group treatment are efficacious methods for managing aphasic patients.

摘要

五个退伍军人管理局医疗中心参与了一项调查,该调查旨在比较针对患有左半球脑血管意外的失语症患者的个体治疗和小组治疗。符合入选标准的患者被随机分配到传统的、针对特定语言缺陷的个体刺激 - 反应型治疗,或旨在通过小组互动和讨论改善沟通但不直接治疗特定语言缺陷的小组治疗。所有患者从发病后四周开始,每周接受八小时的治疗,持续到发病后48周或直到他们退出研究。在入组时以及患者参与研究的每11周进行一系列语言测试和临床神经学评估。结果显示,接受个体治疗和小组治疗的患者在语言能力方面均有显著改善。个体治疗在交际能力的波奇指数上总体表现明显更好;然而,在其他语言测试中,两组之间未观察到显著差异。如果传统观点正确,即发病后三到六个月显著的自发恢复就已完成,那么发病后26周后两组的显著改善表明个体治疗和小组治疗都是管理失语症患者的有效方法。

相似文献

1
Veterans Administration cooperative study on aphasia: a comparison of individual and group treatment.退伍军人管理局失语症合作研究:个体治疗与团体治疗的比较
J Speech Hear Res. 1981 Dec;24(4):580-94. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2404.580.
2
Effects of speech and language treatment on recovery from aphasia.言语和语言治疗对失语症恢复的影响。
Brain Lang. 1984 Nov;23(2):272-99. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(84)90068-3.
3
Comparison of clinic, home, and deferred language treatment for aphasia. A Veterans Administration Cooperative Study.
Arch Neurol. 1986 Jul;43(7):653-8. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1986.00520070011008.
4
Outcome of intensive language treatment in aphasia.
J Speech Hear Disord. 1989 Aug;54(3):471-9. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5403.471.
5
Promoting recovery in chronic aphasia with an interactive technology.使用交互式技术促进慢性失语症的康复。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Aug;78(8):841-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90197-0.
6
Spontaneous recovery of language in patients with aphasia between 4 and 34 weeks after stroke.中风后4至34周失语症患者语言功能的自发恢复
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1985 Aug;48(8):743-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.48.8.743.
7
Comparison of formal language therapy with supportive counseling for aphasia due to acute vascular accident.
Arch Neurol. 1987 Jun;44(6):646-9. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1987.00520180064018.
8
Structure, Processes, and Retrospective Outcomes From an Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Program.强化综合性失语症项目的结构、流程及回顾性结果
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 Nov;24(4):S854-63. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0164.
9
Home treatment for aphasic patients by trained nonprofessionals.由经过培训的非专业人员对失语症患者进行居家治疗。
J Speech Hear Disord. 1989 Aug;54(3):462-70. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5403.462.
10
Language rehabilitation in chronic aphasia and time postonset: a review of single-subject data.慢性失语症的语言康复与发病时间:单病例数据综述
Stroke. 2006 Dec;37(12):3043-51. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000249427.74970.15. Epub 2006 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guideline on aphasia rehabilitation.欧洲卒中组织(ESO)失语症康复指南。
Eur Stroke J. 2025 May 22:23969873241311025. doi: 10.1177/23969873241311025.
2
Self-Reported Quality of Life Outcomes in Aphasia Using Life Participation Approach Values: 1-Year Outcomes.采用生活参与方法价值评估失语症患者自我报告的生活质量结果:1年随访结果
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2019 Sep 13;1(3-4):100025. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2019.100025. eCollection 2019 Dec.
3
A Retrospective Study of Long-Term Improvement on the Boston Naming Test.
一项关于波士顿命名测验长期改善情况的回顾性研究
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Feb 21;29(1S):425-436. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-CAC48-18-0224. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
4
Two to Tango or the More the Merrier? A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effects of Group Size in Aphasia Conversation Treatment on Standardized Tests.两人探戈或多多益善?随机对照试验研究在失语症对话治疗中小组规模对标准化测试的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 May 21;62(5):1437-1451. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0404.
5
Patterns of Recovery From Aphasia in the First 2 Weeks After Stroke.脑卒中后 2 周内失语症恢复模式。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Mar 25;62(3):723-732. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-18-0254.
6
Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke.中风后失语症的言语和语言治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 1;2016(6):CD000425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4.
7
Group therapy as a social context for aphasia recovery: a pilot, observational study in an acute rehabilitation hospital.小组治疗作为失语症康复的社会环境:一项在急性康复医院进行的试点观察性研究。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016 Aug;23(4):276-83. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1155277. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
8
A review on adult pragmatic assessments.成人语用评估综述。
Iran J Neurol. 2014 Jul 4;13(3):113-8.
9
Prosodic changes in aphasic speech: timing.失语症言语中的韵律变化:时间安排
Clin Linguist Phon. 2010 Feb;24(2):155-67. doi: 10.3109/02699200903464439.
10
Speech and language therapy: does it work?言语和语言治疗:它有效吗?
BMJ. 1996 Jun 29;312(7047):1655-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7047.1655.