• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of clinic, home, and deferred language treatment for aphasia. A Veterans Administration Cooperative Study.

作者信息

Wertz R T, Weiss D G, Aten J L, Brookshire R H, García-Buñuel L, Holland A L, Kurtzke J F, LaPointe L L, Milianti F J, Brannegan R

出版信息

Arch Neurol. 1986 Jul;43(7):653-8. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1986.00520070011008.

DOI:10.1001/archneur.1986.00520070011008
PMID:3524513
Abstract

Aphasic patients who met stringent selection criteria were assigned randomly to three groups: clinic treatment by a speech pathologist for 12 weeks, followed by 12 weeks of no treatment; home treatment by a trained volunteer for 12 weeks, followed by 12 weeks of no treatment; or deferred treatment for 12 weeks, followed by 12 weeks of treatment by a speech pathologist. At 12 weeks after entry, language measures indicated that the clinic-treatment patients made significantly more improvement than did the deferred-treatment patients, and improvement in home-treatment patients did not differ significantly from either clinic- or deferred-treatment patients. At 24 weeks after entry, after deferred-treatment patients had received clinic treatment, there were no significant differences among the groups. These results suggest that clinic treatment for aphasia is efficacious, and delaying treatment for 12 weeks does not compromise ultimate improvement.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of clinic, home, and deferred language treatment for aphasia. A Veterans Administration Cooperative Study.
Arch Neurol. 1986 Jul;43(7):653-8. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1986.00520070011008.
2
Home treatment for aphasic patients by trained nonprofessionals.由经过培训的非专业人员对失语症患者进行居家治疗。
J Speech Hear Disord. 1989 Aug;54(3):462-70. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5403.462.
3
Veterans Administration cooperative study on aphasia: a comparison of individual and group treatment.退伍军人管理局失语症合作研究:个体治疗与团体治疗的比较
J Speech Hear Res. 1981 Dec;24(4):580-94. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2404.580.
4
Constraint Induced Aphasia Therapy: Volunteer-led, unconstrained and less intense delivery can be effective.强制性诱导失语症疗法:由志愿者主导、无限制且强度较低的实施方式可能有效。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2016 Jun 23;39(1):97-109. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161341.
5
The efficacy of group communication treatment in adults with chronic aphasia.团体交流治疗对成年慢性失语症患者的疗效。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999 Apr;42(2):411-9. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4202.411.
6
Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke.中风后失语症的言语和语言治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.
7
A profile of aphasia services in three health districts.三个健康区的失语症服务概况。
Br J Disord Commun. 1991 Dec;26(3):293-315. doi: 10.3109/13682829109012016.
8
Volunteer involvement in the support of self-managed computerised aphasia treatment: The volunteer perspective.志愿者参与支持自我管理的计算机化失语症治疗:志愿者的视角。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016 Oct;18(5):411-9. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2015.1101160. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
9
A prospective, randomized, parallel group, controlled study of the effect of intensity of speech and language therapy on early recovery from poststroke aphasia.一项关于言语和语言治疗强度对中风后失语症早期恢复影响的前瞻性、随机、平行组对照研究。
Clin Rehabil. 2007 Oct;21(10):885-94. doi: 10.1177/0269215507078486.
10
Effectiveness of speech therapy for aphasic stroke patients. A randomised controlled trial.失语性中风患者言语治疗的有效性。一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 1984 Jun 2;1(8388):1197-200. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)91690-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Success rates of intensive aphasia therapy: real-world data from 448 patients between 2003 and 2020.强化失语症治疗的成功率:2003 年至 2020 年间 448 例患者的真实世界数据。
J Neurol. 2024 Nov;271(11):7169-7183. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12429-7. Epub 2024 May 20.
2
Comprehensive quality assessment for aphasia rehabilitation after stroke: protocol for a multicentre, mixed-methods study.全面质量评估脑卒中后失语症康复:一项多中心混合方法研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 21;14(3):e080532. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080532.
3
A physician survey of poststroke aphasia diagnosis and treatment in China: SPEECH study.
中国卒中后失语症诊断与治疗的医师调查:SPEECH研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jun 4;100(22):e25833. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025833.
4
Predictors of Poststroke Aphasia Recovery: A Systematic Review-Informed Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.预测脑卒中后失语症恢复的因素:基于系统评价的个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2021 May;52(5):1778-1787. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031162. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
5
Experiences of integrating community volunteers as extensions of the primary care team to help support older adults at home: a qualitative study.将社区志愿者整合为基层医疗团队的延伸,以帮助支持居家老年人:一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 May 16;21(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01165-2.
6
Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke.中风后失语症的言语和语言治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 1;2016(6):CD000425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4.
7
A Single-subject Study to Examine the Effects of Constrained-induced Aphasia Therapy on Naming Deficit.一项单病例研究,旨在探究强制性诱导失语症疗法对命名缺陷的影响。
Int J Prev Med. 2014 Jun;5(6):782-6.
8
Can combination therapy of conventional and oriental medicine improve poststroke aphasia? Comparative, observational, pragmatic study.中西医结合疗法能否改善脑卒中后失语症?一项比较、观察、实用研究。
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:654604. doi: 10.1155/2012/654604. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
9
A randomized controlled trial on very early speech and language therapy in acute stroke patients with aphasia.急性失语症中风患者极早期言语和语言治疗的随机对照试验。
Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2011 Jan-Dec;1(1):66-74. doi: 10.1159/000329835. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
10
Variability in recovery from aphasia.失语症恢复的变异性。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2008 Nov;8(6):497-502. doi: 10.1007/s11910-008-0079-x.