Kafka W, Petri H, Rudolph W
Herz. 1982 Jun;7(3):140-3.
During exercise, ventricular arrhythmias may be observed in 50% of healthy subjects and up to 85% of patients with heart disease. For the quantitative as well as qualitative assessment of ventricular arrhythmias, continuous ECG (Holter) monitoring is superior to the Exercise ECG. Both methods together render a 10% increase in sensitivity over that achieved through the use of one method only. In patients with repeated ventricular tachycardias, assessment through electrical stimulation is more preferable than the use of the exercise ECG or continuous ECG monitoring. In patients with coronary artery disease, ventricular arrhythmias during exercise, depending on their incidence and complexity, may indicate a two to eight-fold increase in the likelihood of cardiac death. The reproducibility of ventricular arrhythmias during repeated exercise testing is reported between 30 and 77%. Thus, in the individual patient, the complete absence of an exercise-induced arrhythmia during treatment does not permit differentiation between therapeutic effect and spontaneous variability. Accordingly, the exercise ECG is generally not an adequate method for assessment of antiarrhythmic treatment.
运动期间,50%的健康受试者以及高达85%的心脏病患者可能会出现室性心律失常。对于室性心律失常的定量和定性评估,连续心电图(动态心电图)监测优于运动心电图。两种方法结合使用比仅使用一种方法的敏感性提高10%。对于反复出现室性心动过速的患者,通过电刺激进行评估比使用运动心电图或连续心电图监测更为可取。在冠心病患者中,运动期间的室性心律失常,根据其发生率和复杂性,可能表明心脏死亡风险增加两至八倍。据报道,重复运动测试期间室性心律失常的再现率在30%至77%之间。因此,对于个体患者而言,治疗期间完全没有运动诱发的心律失常并不能区分治疗效果和自发变异性。相应地,运动心电图通常不是评估抗心律失常治疗的合适方法。