Suppr超能文献

运动试验在室性心律失常评估中的应用(作者译)

[Exercise testing in the assessment of ventricular arrhythmias (author's transl)].

作者信息

Kafka W, Petri H, Rudolph W

出版信息

Herz. 1982 Jun;7(3):140-3.

PMID:6178669
Abstract

During exercise, ventricular arrhythmias may be observed in 50% of healthy subjects and up to 85% of patients with heart disease. For the quantitative as well as qualitative assessment of ventricular arrhythmias, continuous ECG (Holter) monitoring is superior to the Exercise ECG. Both methods together render a 10% increase in sensitivity over that achieved through the use of one method only. In patients with repeated ventricular tachycardias, assessment through electrical stimulation is more preferable than the use of the exercise ECG or continuous ECG monitoring. In patients with coronary artery disease, ventricular arrhythmias during exercise, depending on their incidence and complexity, may indicate a two to eight-fold increase in the likelihood of cardiac death. The reproducibility of ventricular arrhythmias during repeated exercise testing is reported between 30 and 77%. Thus, in the individual patient, the complete absence of an exercise-induced arrhythmia during treatment does not permit differentiation between therapeutic effect and spontaneous variability. Accordingly, the exercise ECG is generally not an adequate method for assessment of antiarrhythmic treatment.

摘要

运动期间,50%的健康受试者以及高达85%的心脏病患者可能会出现室性心律失常。对于室性心律失常的定量和定性评估,连续心电图(动态心电图)监测优于运动心电图。两种方法结合使用比仅使用一种方法的敏感性提高10%。对于反复出现室性心动过速的患者,通过电刺激进行评估比使用运动心电图或连续心电图监测更为可取。在冠心病患者中,运动期间的室性心律失常,根据其发生率和复杂性,可能表明心脏死亡风险增加两至八倍。据报道,重复运动测试期间室性心律失常的再现率在30%至77%之间。因此,对于个体患者而言,治疗期间完全没有运动诱发的心律失常并不能区分治疗效果和自发变异性。相应地,运动心电图通常不是评估抗心律失常治疗的合适方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验