Podrid P J, Blatt C M
Herz. 1984 Apr;9(2):65-76.
Sudden cardiac death due to ventricular fibrillation is the most common cause of death in industrialized countries. Patients with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death may be found to have, in addition to high-grade ventricular arrhythmias, impaired left ventricular function. Mechanisms responsible for precipitation of ventricular fibrillation include risk factors such as increased sympathetic nervous system activity, electrolyte disturbances, coronary artery spasm and transient, thrombotic coronary artery occlusion. For detection of high-grade arrhythmias as well as for assessment of treatment, continuous 24-hour EKG monitoring and exercise EKG should be employed. The indication for antiarrhythmic therapy should be regarded as established in patients successfully resuscitated after unexpected ventricular fibrillation as well as in patients status-post myocardial infarction, with angina pectoris, cardiomyopathies, QT-prolongation, mitral valve prolapse, congenital or other markedly symptomatic heart disease and high-grade ventricular arrhythmias. The treatment initiated, after discontinuation of all antiarrhythmic drugs for at least four half lives and ambulatory EKG monitoring for 48 hours as well as maximal symptom-limited exercise testing, should be evaluated after acute drug administration and after 72 hours of maintained therapy with the aid of continuous EKG monitoring and exercise EKG. In patients with a history of malignant arrhythmias in whom no evidence of high-grade ventricular arrhythmias can be found in either the continuous EKG recording or in the exercise EKG, initiation of drug treatment should be based on the results of programmed electrical stimulation. Effective treatment can be assumed on documentation of complete suppression of arrhythmias grade IVb and V or prevention of precipitation of ventricular tachycardias, respectively, as well as 90% reduction of grade IVa and 50% reduction of premature ventricular beats. During acute testing, aggravation of arrhythmias after administration of antiarrhythmic drugs was seen in 11.1%. While the yearly mortality of successfully controlled patients ranged between 2.3 and 2.8%, the yearly mortality rate in those in whom the arrhythmias were inadequately controlled ranged from 43.6 to 56%.
在工业化国家,室颤导致的心脏性猝死是最常见的死亡原因。心脏性猝死风险增加的患者,除了有高级别室性心律失常外,还可能存在左心室功能受损。引发室颤的机制包括一些危险因素,如交感神经系统活动增强、电解质紊乱、冠状动脉痉挛以及短暂性血栓性冠状动脉闭塞。为了检测高级别心律失常以及评估治疗效果,应采用连续24小时心电图监测和运动心电图检查。对于意外室颤复苏成功的患者、心肌梗死后患者、伴有心绞痛、心肌病、QT间期延长、二尖瓣脱垂、先天性或其他明显有症状的心脏病以及高级别室性心律失常的患者,抗心律失常治疗的指征应视为明确。在停用所有抗心律失常药物至少四个半衰期、进行48小时动态心电图监测以及最大症状限制运动试验后开始的治疗,应在急性给药后以及维持治疗72小时后,借助连续心电图监测和运动心电图进行评估。对于有恶性心律失常病史但在连续心电图记录或运动心电图中均未发现高级别室性心律失常证据的患者,药物治疗的启动应基于程序电刺激的结果。分别记录到IVb级和V级心律失常完全抑制或室性心动过速诱发被预防,以及IVa级心律失常减少90%和室性早搏减少50%时,可认为治疗有效。在急性测试期间,11.1%的患者在给予抗心律失常药物后心律失常加重。虽然成功控制心律失常的患者年死亡率在2.3%至2.8%之间,但心律失常控制不佳的患者年死亡率在43.6%至56%之间。