Swanson L W, Sawchenko P E, Cowan W M
J Neurosci. 1981 May;1(5):548-59. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.01-05-00548.1981.
Although it has been recognized for some years that each cytoarchitectonic field of Ammon's horn and the subiculum gives rise to a specific pattern of cortical and subcortical projections, it has not been clear whether these various projections arise from different populations of neurons within each field or whether they arise as collaterals from an essentially homogeneous population of cells. We have examined this problem, and the related issue of the origin of the commissural and ipsilateral associational projections of the dentate gyrus, by injecting retrogradely transported fluorescent dyes into two or more of the relevant projection fields in adult rats and subsequently examining the brains for doubly or triply labeled neurons. It is clear from these experiments that at least two of the known efferent projections of field CA1 (to the septum and to the entorhinal cortex) arise from the same pyramidal neurons and also that the commissural, ipsilateral associational, septal, and subicular projections of the other major field of Ammon's horn--field CA3--similarly are due to collaterals. Double-labeling experiments also indicate that at least 80% of the cells in the deep hilar region of the dentate gyrus give rise to both an ipsilateral (associational) and a crossed (or commissural) projection to the dentate granule cells. In contrast, the projection neurons in the dorsal part of the subiculum form a quite heterogeneous population; cells that project to both the septum and the entorhinal area are intermingled with others that project to one or the other area but not to both. The cortical and cortico-subcortical connections of the hippocampal formation thus appear to be quite different from those of the neo-cortex, and the existence of such an extensive system of collateral projections clearly has important consequences for studies of the development of the hippocampus and of its response to selective deafferentation.
尽管多年来人们已经认识到,海马角和海马下托的每个细胞构筑区都会产生特定的皮质和皮质下投射模式,但尚不清楚这些不同的投射是源自每个区域内不同的神经元群体,还是源自本质上同质的细胞群体的侧支。我们通过向成年大鼠的两个或更多相关投射区域逆行注射可转运荧光染料,随后检查大脑中双重或三重标记的神经元,研究了这个问题以及齿状回连合和同侧联合投射的起源这一相关问题。从这些实验中可以清楚地看出,CA1区至少两种已知的传出投射(到隔区和内嗅皮质)源自相同的锥体细胞,而且海马角的另一个主要区域——CA3区的连合、同侧联合、隔区和海马下托投射同样是由侧支形成的。双重标记实验还表明,齿状回深部海马门区至少80%的细胞会向齿状颗粒细胞发出同侧(联合)和交叉(或连合)投射。相比之下,海马下托背侧的投射神经元构成了一个相当异质的群体;投射到隔区和内嗅区的细胞与投射到其中一个区域而非两个区域的细胞相互混杂。因此,海马结构的皮质和皮质 - 皮质下连接似乎与新皮质的连接有很大不同,这种广泛的侧支投射系统的存在显然对海马发育及其对选择性传入神经阻滞反应的研究具有重要意义。