Suppr超能文献

经尿道前列腺切除术与膀胱颈切开术治疗前列腺增生症的客观比较。

An objective comparison of transurethral resection and bladder neck incision in the treatment of prostatic hypertrophy.

作者信息

Edwards L, Powell C

出版信息

J Urol. 1982 Aug;128(2):325-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)52908-0.

Abstract

Transurethral resection has become the operation of choice in almost all cases of benign prostatic enlargement. However, when the gland does not exceed 30 gm. bladder neck incision is easier to perform, results in a lower morbidity, and is less likely to be followed by incontinence and retrograde ejaculation. We studied 2 groups of men with proved obstruction. Complete urodynamic investigation was done on 51 patients before and on 44 patients after the operation. We compared our subjective and objective findings in the 2 groups. The conclusion suggest that bladder neck incision is as effective as transurethral resection in relieving the obstruction of prostatic enlargement in the presence of a small gland.

摘要

经尿道切除术几乎已成为所有良性前列腺增生病例的首选手术方式。然而,当腺体重量不超过30克时,膀胱颈切开术操作更容易,发病率更低,且术后发生尿失禁和逆行射精的可能性更小。我们研究了两组确诊为梗阻的男性患者。对51例患者术前及44例患者术后进行了全面的尿动力学检查。我们比较了两组患者的主观和客观检查结果。结论表明,在前列腺较小的情况下,膀胱颈切开术在缓解前列腺增生梗阻方面与经尿道切除术效果相当。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验