Krepler R, Denk H, Artlieb U, Fichtinger E, Davidovits A
Pathol Res Pract. 1982;175(2-3):212-26. doi: 10.1016/S0344-0338(82)80109-X.
Antibodies to human and bovine epidermal prekeratin and antibodies to mouse liver cytokeratin component D (Mr 49 000) have been applied in indirect immunofluorescence microscopy on sections of human tumors of mammary gland and liver. In non-neoplastic mammary gland all epithelial cells were stained with these antibodies. In pre-invasive and invasive ductal and lobular carcinomas a cell population was observed which was not significantly stained with antibodies to epidermal prekeratin but did strongly react with antibodies to liver cytokeratin D. In the liver, the antibodies to epidermal prekeratin as well as those directed against liver cytokeratin D strongly decorated bile duct epithelia. In contrast, significant staining of the hepatocytes was only achieved with antibodies to liver cytokeratin D. This different staining reaction was maintained in liver tumors of hepatocellular and cholangiocellular origin. Antibodies to vimentin stained mesenchymal cells and tumors of mesenchymal derivation but reacted not significantly with any of the epithelial and carcinoma cells examined. The difference is of practical importance for the discrimination between anaplastic carcinomas and sarcomas of unknown origin. Cytokeratin could also be detected by antibody staining using the peroxidase-antiperoxidase (PAP) technique in formaldehyde-fixed and paraffin-embedded material of skin, gastrointestinal, respiratory, urinary and genital tract as well as various glands, liver and kidney. Examples of positive reactions were shown in a squamous cell carcinoma, a basalioma and a pleomorphic adenoma of the parotis. It is concluded that the immunohistochemical analysis of intermediate filament proteins has diagnostic potential in clinical pathology and may help to elucidate histogenesis and differentiation of tumors and possibly also prognosis of tumor growth. It is further suggested to use antibodies recognizing different subsets of proteins of the cytokeratin family in order to distinguish between different types of carcinomas.
人及牛表皮前角蛋白抗体和小鼠肝细胞角蛋白成分D(分子量49000)抗体已用于人乳腺和肝脏肿瘤切片的间接免疫荧光显微镜检查。在非肿瘤性乳腺中,所有上皮细胞均被这些抗体染色。在原位癌和浸润性导管癌及小叶癌中,观察到一群细胞,它们对表皮前角蛋白抗体染色不明显,但与肝细胞角蛋白D抗体强烈反应。在肝脏中,表皮前角蛋白抗体以及针对肝细胞角蛋白D的抗体强烈标记胆管上皮。相比之下,仅用肝细胞角蛋白D抗体才能使肝细胞有明显染色。这种不同的染色反应在肝细胞源性和胆管细胞源性肝肿瘤中均保持。波形蛋白抗体可使间充质细胞及间充质来源的肿瘤染色,但与所检查的任何上皮细胞和癌细胞反应不明显。这种差异对于鉴别来源不明的间变性癌和肉瘤具有实际重要性。在皮肤、胃肠道、呼吸道、泌尿生殖道以及各种腺体、肝脏和肾脏的甲醛固定石蜡包埋材料中,也可用过氧化物酶-抗过氧化物酶(PAP)技术通过抗体染色检测细胞角蛋白。在鳞状细胞癌、基底细胞瘤和腮腺多形性腺瘤中显示了阳性反应实例。结论是,中间丝蛋白的免疫组织化学分析在临床病理学中具有诊断潜力,可能有助于阐明肿瘤的组织发生和分化,也可能有助于判断肿瘤生长的预后。还建议使用识别细胞角蛋白家族不同蛋白质亚群的抗体,以区分不同类型的癌。