Celesia G G, Meredith J T, Pluff K
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1983 Jul;56(1):16-30. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(83)90003-2.
Confrontation field examination, perimetry, visual evoked potentials (VEPs) to pattern hemi-field stimulation and visual evoked spectrum array to flash stimulation were compared in 50 patients with homonymous hemianopsia. Visual field could be examined by confrontation in all patients and demonstrated the field defect in 96% of cases. Goldmann perimetry could only be performed in 60% of patients, but always quantitatively defined the margins of the defect. VEPs could only be tested in 77% of patients and demonstrated an abnormality in 79% of cases. VEPs were absent to stimulation of the affected hemifield in every case of homonymous field defects with macular splitting. Visual evoked spectrum array could be tested in 95% of patients and revealed abnormalities in 67% of cases. The relative value of each test is discussed.
对50例同向性偏盲患者进行了面对面视野检查、视野计检查、半视野图形刺激视觉诱发电位(VEP)和闪光刺激视觉诱发电谱阵列检查。所有患者均可通过面对面检查进行视野检查,96%的病例显示有视野缺损。仅60%的患者可进行Goldmann视野计检查,但总能定量确定缺损边界。仅77%的患者可进行VEP检查,79%的病例显示异常。在每例伴有黄斑分裂的同向性视野缺损病例中,患侧半视野刺激均未引出VEP。95%的患者可进行视觉诱发电谱阵列检查,67%的病例显示异常。讨论了每项检查的相对价值。