Johnson G J, Costello W G, Oken M M, Sponzo R W, Barnes J M, Ezdinli E Z, Bennett J M, Silverstein M N, Glick J H, Berard C W
Cancer. 1983 Oct 1;52(7):1133-41. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19831001)52:7<1133::aid-cncr2820520702>3.0.co;2-m.
In an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group non-Hodgkin's lymphoma clinical trial, 90 patients with Stage III or IV diffuse histiocytic lymphoma (DHL) were treated with one of four chemotherapy regimens. All patients were previously untreated with chemotherapy, and careful restaging was required to document responses. Each treatment included cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (COP) plus Adriamycin (COPA), BCNU (BCVP) or bleomycin (COPB and CPOB). The two bleomycin-containing regimens differed only in the schedule of drug administration. CPOB-treated patients received cyclophosphamide on day 1, prednisone on days 1 to 5 and vincristine and bleomycin on day 15 of each 21-day cycle. COPB-treated patients received the same four drugs in the same dosage; however, the schedule was changed so that vincristine and bleomycin were given on day 1. Treatment of responders was continued for 8 cycles. Those with a complete response (CR) were randomized to maintenance therapy with BCVP or no treatment. Treatment with CPOB yielded a CR rate of 55% compared to 25% for COPB (P = 0.07). In contrast to COPB, treatment with CPOB was associated with a significantly longer median duration of CR (26.5 versus 5.7 months; P less than 0.05) and median survival (27.7 versus 11.2 months; P less than 0.02). The CR rate was 31% for BCVP and 45% for COPA, and the median survivals were 10.7 months and 14.4 months, respectively. One half of the CPOB-treated patients who achieved CR remained alive in continuous CR after 30 to 72 months. No advantage for maintenance therapy was observed. Myelotoxicity was greater with CPOB than COPB, but comparable to COPA. This trial demonstrated that the results of treatment of DHL with COP plus bleomycin were strikingly dependent upon the schedule of administration of bleomycin and vincristine. Bleomycin effectively combined with COP, as in CPOB, yielded results comparable to those obtained when Adriamycin was added to COP. CPOB appears to be an effective treatment for DHL that should be considered as an alternative to other regimens, particularly for patients who cannot receive Adriamycin.
在东部肿瘤协作组的一项非霍奇金淋巴瘤临床试验中,90例Ⅲ期或Ⅳ期弥漫性组织细胞淋巴瘤(DHL)患者接受了四种化疗方案之一的治疗。所有患者此前均未接受过化疗,且需要仔细重新分期以记录疗效。每种治疗方案都包括环磷酰胺、长春新碱和泼尼松(COP),再加上阿霉素(COPA)、卡氮芥(BCVP)或博来霉素(COPB和CPOB)。两种含博来霉素的方案仅在给药时间表上有所不同。接受CPOB治疗的患者在每21天周期的第1天接受环磷酰胺治疗,第1至5天接受泼尼松治疗,并在第15天接受长春新碱和博来霉素治疗。接受COPB治疗的患者接受相同剂量的四种药物;然而,给药时间表有所改变,使得长春新碱和博来霉素在第1天给药。对有反应的患者持续治疗8个周期。那些完全缓解(CR)的患者被随机分配接受BCVP维持治疗或不接受治疗。CPOB治疗的CR率为55%,而COPB为25%(P = 0.07)。与COPB相比,CPOB治疗的患者CR的中位持续时间显著更长(26.5个月对5.7个月;P < 0.05),中位生存期也更长(27.7个月对11.2个月;P < 0.02)。BCVP的CR率为31%,COPA为45%,中位生存期分别为10.7个月和14.4个月。在达到CR的接受CPOB治疗的患者中,有一半在30至72个月后仍持续完全缓解存活。未观察到维持治疗有优势。CPOB的骨髓毒性比COPB更大,但与COPA相当。该试验表明,COP加博来霉素治疗DHL的结果显著取决于博来霉素和长春新碱的给药时间表。如在CPOB中那样,博来霉素与COP有效联合产生的结果与在COP中加入阿霉素时获得的结果相当。CPOB似乎是一种治疗DHL的有效方法,应被视为其他方案的替代方案,特别是对于不能接受阿霉素的患者。