Suppr超能文献

三种强化化疗方案治疗晚期不良组织学类型非霍奇金淋巴瘤的前瞻性随机临床试验。

Prospectively randomized clinical trial of three intensive chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of advanced unfavorable histology non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

作者信息

O'Connell M J, Harrington D P, Earle J D, Johnson G J, Glick J H, Carbone P P, Creech R H, Neiman R S, Mann R B, Silverstein M N

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1987 Sep;5(9):1329-39. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1987.5.9.1329.

Abstract

Three hundred thirty-two eligible patients with advanced (Ann Arbor stage III or IV) non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of aggressive histologic subtype (Rappaport classification diffuse histiocytic [DH], diffuse poorly differentiated lymphocytic [DPDL], diffuse mixed [DM], or diffuse undifferentiated [DU]) were randomly assigned to receive induction chemotherapy with one of three intensive regimens in a clinical trial conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) between 1978 and 1983. Chemotherapy regimens consisted of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, and doxorubicin (Adriamycin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH) (COPA) administered in 3-week cycles; cyclophosphamide plus doxorubicin plus prednisone beginning day 1, with vincristine plus bleomycin day 15 of each 3-week cycle (COPA + Bleo); or cyclophosphamide plus doxorubicin plus procarbazine beginning day 1, and bleomycin plus vincristine plus prednisone beginning day 15 of each 4-week cycle (CAP-BOP). The median patient follow-up from study entry for patients still alive is 5 years. The three regimens were not significantly different with respect to complete response (CR) rates (43% to 46%), time to progression of malignant disease (median, 1.0 to 1.7 years), or survival (5-year survival, 34% to 45%), although duration of complete remission appeared to be shorter in patients receiving COPA (P = .03). COPA + Bleo and CAP-BOP were significantly more toxic than the COPA regimen. This study did not demonstrate any substantial therapeutic advantage associated with the addition of a fifth or sixth chemotherapy drug, or with treatment administered on a more frequent administration schedule, compared with the COPA regimen in this population of patients with advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The relatively small proportion of long-term disease-free survivors treated with COPA underscores the need for prospective clinical trials of new and more effective treatments for patients with these potentially curable tumors.

摘要

1978年至1983年间,东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)开展了一项临床试验,332例符合条件的晚期(Ann Arbor分期III期或IV期)侵袭性组织学亚型非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者(Rappaport分类:弥漫性组织细胞型[DH]、弥漫性低分化淋巴细胞型[DPDL]、弥漫性混合型[DM]或弥漫性未分化型[DU])被随机分配接受三种强化方案之一的诱导化疗。化疗方案包括以3周为周期给予环磷酰胺、长春新碱、泼尼松和阿霉素(阿霉素;阿德里亚实验室,俄亥俄州哥伦布市)(COPA);第1天开始给予环磷酰胺加阿霉素加泼尼松,每3周周期的第15天给予长春新碱加博来霉素(COPA + 博来霉素);或第1天开始给予环磷酰胺加阿霉素加丙卡巴肼,每4周周期的第15天开始给予博来霉素加长春新碱加泼尼松(CAP - BOP)。对于仍存活的患者,从研究入组开始的中位随访时间为5年。三种方案在完全缓解(CR)率(43%至46%)、恶性疾病进展时间(中位,1.0至1.7年)或生存率(5年生存率,34%至45%)方面无显著差异,尽管接受COPA方案的患者完全缓解持续时间似乎较短(P = 0.03)。COPA + 博来霉素和CAP - BOP的毒性明显高于COPA方案。与COPA方案相比,本研究未证明在该晚期弥漫性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者群体中添加第五种或第六种化疗药物或采用更频繁给药方案进行治疗有任何实质性治疗优势。接受COPA方案治疗的长期无病生存者比例相对较小,这凸显了对这些潜在可治愈肿瘤患者进行新的更有效治疗的前瞻性临床试验的必要性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验