Jones S E, Grozea P N, Metz E N, Haut A, Stephens R L, Morrison F S, Butler J J, Byrne G E, Moon T E, Fisher R, Haskins C L, Coltman C A
Cancer. 1979 Feb;43(2):417-25. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197902)43:2<417::aid-cncr2820430203>3.0.co;2-i.
As a part of an ongoing prospective controlled trial, the Southwest Oncology Group compared the results of treatment of advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with two CHOP regimens (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine and prednisone with either low-dose bleomycin or BCG by scarification) to a COP regimen (cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone) with low-dose bleomycin (COP-Bleo). The study design emphasized histopathology review and systematic restaging to define complete remission (CR). Confirmed rates of CR for 443 evaluable patients were 59% for 286 patients receiving the CHOP regimens and 59% for 157 patients receiving COP-Bleo. Rates of CR were higher for patients with nodular lymphoma (69%) compared to those with diffuse lymphoma (54%) (p = 0.005). For patients with nodular lymphoma there was no difference in CR rates according to treatment. For patients with diffuse lymphomas the CR rate was higher with the CHOP programs (58%) than with COP-Bleo (44%) (p = 0.10). Overall duration of CR and survival was significantly longer for patients with nodular lymphoma compared to diffuse lymphoma (p less than 0.01). At this time, remission duration and survival were similar regardless of induction regimen used in patients with nodular lymphoma. However, in patients with diffuse lymphoma, the duration of CR and overall survival were improved by treatment with the CHOP regimens compared to COP-Bleo (p = 0.02). Thus, in this controlled study we have demonstrated that initial combination chemotherapy employing the CHOP regimen was a superior remission induction therapy for patients with diffuse lymphoma.
作为一项正在进行的前瞻性对照试验的一部分,西南肿瘤协作组将两种CHOP方案(环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和泼尼松联合低剂量博来霉素或划痕接种卡介苗)治疗晚期非霍奇金淋巴瘤的结果与COP方案(环磷酰胺、长春新碱和泼尼松)联合低剂量博来霉素(COP-Bleo)进行了比较。该研究设计强调组织病理学复查和系统再分期以确定完全缓解(CR)。443例可评估患者中,接受CHOP方案的286例患者的CR确认率为59%,接受COP-Bleo方案的157例患者的CR确认率为59%。结节性淋巴瘤患者的CR率(69%)高于弥漫性淋巴瘤患者(54%)(p = 0.005)。对于结节性淋巴瘤患者,根据治疗方法不同,CR率没有差异。对于弥漫性淋巴瘤患者,CHOP方案的CR率(58%)高于COP-Bleo方案(44%)(p = 0.10)。与弥漫性淋巴瘤患者相比,结节性淋巴瘤患者的CR和生存总持续时间显著更长(p小于0.01)。此时,结节性淋巴瘤患者无论采用何种诱导方案,缓解持续时间和生存率相似。然而,在弥漫性淋巴瘤患者中,与COP-Bleo方案相比,CHOP方案治疗可改善CR持续时间和总生存率(p = 0.02)。因此,在这项对照研究中,我们证明了采用CHOP方案的初始联合化疗是弥漫性淋巴瘤患者更优的缓解诱导疗法。