Frank A, Eisenthal S, Lazare A
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1978 Jan;35(1):61-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1978.01770250063006.
Traditionally, lower-class individuals who have sought psychiatric help have been hampered in their efforts by classrelated inequities in the delivery of psychiatric services. A common explanation for this phenomenon has been that the treatment conceptions of lower-class individuals are "inappropriate." This report presents theoretical and research evidence challenging this notion. A review of the literature from 1954 through 1974 yielded no good evidence that lower-class patients need, expect, or want treatments incongruent with those of upper-middle-class therapists. An experimental study of the requests for help made by 278 walk-in clinic patients confirmed this observation. Patient requests, as measured by an 84-item, self-rated questionnaire, were largely independent of social class. It was concluded that social class differences in treatment disposition and outcome cannot be attributed to social class differences in patients' treatment conceptions. The possibility that methodological and sociological factors can account for the discrepancies between the findings of this study and past studies is discussed. Strategies for minimizing treatment biases against lower-class patients and for maximizing treatment effectiveness with higher-class patients are also suggested.
传统上,寻求精神科帮助的下层阶级个体在获取精神科服务时因与阶级相关的不平等而阻碍了他们的努力。对这一现象的常见解释是,下层阶级个体的治疗观念“不合适”。本报告提供了理论和研究证据对这一观点提出挑战。对1954年至1974年的文献回顾未发现有力证据表明下层阶级患者需要、期望或想要与中上层阶级治疗师不同的治疗。一项对278名门诊患者求助请求的实验研究证实了这一观察结果。通过一份84项自评问卷衡量,患者的请求在很大程度上与社会阶层无关。得出的结论是,治疗倾向和结果中的社会阶层差异不能归因于患者治疗观念中的社会阶层差异。讨论了方法学和社会学因素能否解释本研究结果与以往研究结果之间差异的可能性。还提出了尽量减少对下层阶级患者的治疗偏见以及最大限度提高对上层阶级患者治疗效果的策略。