• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

极重度多重残疾儿童听力测试中的观察者偏差

Observer bias in the hearing testing of profoundly involved multiply handicapped children.

作者信息

Gans D P, Flexer C

出版信息

Ear Hear. 1982 Nov-Dec;3(6):309-13. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198211000-00004.

DOI:10.1097/00003446-198211000-00004
PMID:6218004
Abstract

Observer bias was investigated using 27 profoundly involved multiply handicapped children and behavioral observation audiometry. Two observers were in the room with the child, two others viewed via a video monitor, and each of the four observers had full knowledge of stimulus-type and intensity. Two additional observers viewed a videotape without being provided information about the stimuli. Results showed clear bias effects in 85% of the children. At low intensities, observers aware of stimulus events tended to score fewer responses than those judges unaware of stimulus intensity. At high levels, this trend was reversed. It is recommended that the estimation of hearing threshold in handicapped children be made by observers who do not have access to the sequence of stimulus presentations.

摘要

利用27名重度多重残疾儿童和行为观察听力测定法对观察者偏差进行了研究。两名观察者与儿童在同一房间,另外两名通过视频监视器观察,四名观察者都完全知晓刺激类型和强度。另外两名观察者观看录像带,但未被告知有关刺激的信息。结果显示,85%的儿童存在明显的偏差效应。在低强度时,知晓刺激事件的观察者给出的反应得分往往比不知晓刺激强度的评判者要少。在高强度时,这种趋势则相反。建议由无法得知刺激呈现顺序的观察者来评估残疾儿童的听力阈值。

相似文献

1
Observer bias in the hearing testing of profoundly involved multiply handicapped children.极重度多重残疾儿童听力测试中的观察者偏差
Ear Hear. 1982 Nov-Dec;3(6):309-13. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198211000-00004.
2
Improving behavior observation audiometry testing and scoring procedures.改进行为观察听力测试及评分程序。
Ear Hear. 1987 Apr;8(2):92-100. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198704000-00006.
3
A classical conditioning procedure for the hearing assessment of multiply handicapped persons.一种用于多重残障人士听力评估的经典条件作用程序。
J Speech Hear Disord. 1989 Feb;54(1):88-93. doi: 10.1044/jshd.5401.88.
4
Auditory response behavior of severely and profoundly multiply handicapped children.
J Aud Res. 1983 Apr;23(2):137-48.
5
Acoustic impedance measurement in the otological assessment of multiply handicapped children.
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1976;1(3):221-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1976.tb00880.x.
6
Classical conditioning of profoundly retarded, multiply handicapped children.重度智力迟钝、多重残疾儿童的经典条件作用
Dev Med Child Neurol. 1979 Dec;21(6):779-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1979.tb01701.x.
7
[Objective hearing tests in pediatric audiology: AGERA recommendations for follow-up diagnosis in infants that fail newborn hearing screening tests].[儿科听力学中的客观听力测试:AGERA关于新生儿听力筛查测试未通过婴儿后续诊断的建议]
HNO. 2012 Dec;60(12):1100-2. doi: 10.1007/s00106-012-2619-6.
8
Problems in diagnosis and management of the multiply handicapped deaf child.多重残疾失聪儿童的诊断与管理问题
Arch Otolaryngol. 1973 Oct;98(4):269-74. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1973.00780020279011.
9
Comparative evaluation of the auditory responsiveness of normal infants and profoundly multihandicapped children.
J Speech Hear Res. 1985 Jun;28(2):163-8. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2802.163.
10
A comparative study of profoundly multiply handicapped children's scores on the Bayley and the Griffiths developmental scales.重度多重残疾儿童在贝利和格里菲斯发展量表上得分的比较研究。
Child Care Health Dev. 1985 Jan-Feb;11(1):31-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.1985.tb00447.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Importance of Newborn Genetic Screening for Early Identification of GJB2 and SLC26A4 Related Hearing Loss.新生儿基因筛查对早期识别GJB2和SLC26A4相关听力损失的重要性
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jun;172(6):2082-2089. doi: 10.1002/ohn.1188. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
2
Future directions for screening and treatment in congenital hearing loss.先天性听力损失的筛查与治疗的未来方向。
Precis Clin Med. 2020 Sep;3(3):175-186. doi: 10.1093/pcmedi/pbaa025. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
3
Interrater Reliability for a Two-Interval, Observer-Based Procedure for Measuring Hearing in Young Children.
基于观察者的两区间测量幼儿听力的方法的组内信度。
Am J Audiol. 2020 Dec 9;29(4):762-773. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJA-20-00022. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
4
The audiologic assessment of the young pediatric patient: the clinic.小儿患者的听力评估:临床实践
Trends Amplif. 1999 Jun;4(2):51-60. doi: 10.1177/108471389900400205.