Russo J, Russo M E
Clin Pharm. 1982 May-Jun;1(3):207-16.
The antimicrobial spectra, pharmacokinetics, tissue penetration, side effects, clinical trials and indications, dosage, and cost of mezlocillin (Mezlin) and piperacillin (Pipracil), two new semisynthetic beta-lactam penicillins, are reviewed. Both mezlocillin and piperacillin are active against a wider range of bacteria than previously available penicillins, but their spectra are not identical. Piperacillin is more active than mezlocillin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa; their activities against Klebsiella pneumoniae, Streptococcus faecalis, and Bacteroides fragilis are similar to one another. Neither drug is absorbed orally; both are well absorbed (60-70%) after i.m. injection. Following i.v. infusion or injection, both drugs distribute rapidly (distribution half-life = 10-20 min); neither is protein bound substantially. Both drugs are primarily excreted unchanged in the urine by glomerular filtration and tubular secretion. Elimination half-lives of both drugs are slightly prolonged in renal-failure patients. However, the half-life of mezlocillin in renal failure is longer then the half-life of piperacillin because of dose-dependent kinetics of mezlocillin at low glomecular filtration rates. Probenecid alters the disposition of both drugs. Both drugs are widely distributed throughout the body. Reported side effects are similar to those of other penicillins. Mezlocillin and piperacillin may be used to treat susceptible organisms causing the following conditions: complicated and uncomplicated urinary-tract infections, septicemia, uncomplicated gonococcal urethritis, and lower respiratory-tract, intra-abdominal, gynecologic, skin, and skin-structure infections. Piperacillin is also effective for bone and joint infections. Dosages of both antibiotics should be adjusted based on patients' clinical condition and renal status. Both agents are relatively expensive in comparison with older penicillins and cephalosporins; their daily costs are similar to third-generation cephalosporins, carbenicillin, and ticarcillin. The potential benefits of mezlocillin and piperacillin are in their extended in vitro spectra of activity and minimal toxicities. More comparative clinical trials are needed to support any claims of clinical superiority of these drugs over older, less expensive regimens.
本文综述了两种新型半合成β-内酰胺类青霉素——美洛西林(Mezlin)和哌拉西林(Pipracil)的抗菌谱、药代动力学、组织穿透力、副作用、临床试验及适应证、剂量和成本。美洛西林和哌拉西林对细菌的活性范围比以往的青霉素更广,但它们的抗菌谱并不相同。哌拉西林对铜绿假单胞菌的活性比美洛西林更强;它们对肺炎克雷伯菌、粪肠球菌和脆弱拟杆菌的活性相似。两种药物均不能口服吸收;肌内注射后吸收良好(60%-70%)。静脉输注或注射后,两种药物分布迅速(分布半衰期=10-20分钟);两者与蛋白结合率均不高。两种药物主要通过肾小球滤过和肾小管分泌以原形经尿液排泄。肾衰竭患者中两种药物的消除半衰期均略有延长。然而,由于美洛西林在低肾小球滤过率时存在剂量依赖性动力学,其在肾衰竭患者中的半衰期比哌拉西林更长。丙磺舒会改变两种药物的处置。两种药物均广泛分布于全身。报道的副作用与其他青霉素相似。美洛西林和哌拉西林可用于治疗由以下病原体引起的易感感染:复杂性和非复杂性尿路感染、败血症、非复杂性淋菌性尿道炎以及下呼吸道、腹腔内、妇科、皮肤和皮肤结构感染。哌拉西林对骨和关节感染也有效。两种抗生素的剂量应根据患者的临床状况和肾功能进行调整。与较老的青霉素和头孢菌素相比,两种药物相对昂贵;它们的每日成本与第三代头孢菌素、羧苄西林和替卡西林相似。美洛西林和哌拉西林的潜在优势在于其体外活性谱更广且毒性最小。需要更多的比较性临床试验来支持这些药物相对于较老的、成本较低的治疗方案在临床疗效上更具优势的任何说法。