Suppr超能文献

第三代头孢菌素:批判性评价

Third-generation cephalosporins: a critical evaluation.

作者信息

Barriere S L, Flaherty J F

出版信息

Clin Pharm. 1984 Jul-Aug;3(4):351-73.

PMID:6432420
Abstract

Six third-generation cephalosporins--cefotaxime, moxalactam, cefoperazone, ceftizoxime, ceftriaxone, and cefmenoxime--are reviewed; covered are chemistry and structure-activity relationships, mechanism of action, spectra of activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical utility, adverse effects, and cost effectiveness. The third-generation cephalosporins have a similar mechanism of action to that of other beta-lactam antibiotics. None of the agents is particularly active against certain gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; the drugs are effective against gonococci, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria meningitidis. Several common gram-negative pathogens are susceptible to the third-generation cephalosporins, including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Citrobacter diversus, Proteus, and Morganella. About 50% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates are susceptible. Only moxalactam has good activity against Bacteriodes fragilis. The pharmacokinetic profiles of the six agents reveal some important differences. The half-life of ceftriaxone allows once-daily dosing in many patients; the half-lives of ceftizoxime and cefoperazone permit dosing every 8-12 hours. Cefoperazone and ceftriaxone are highly protein bound, but the clinical relevance of this is unknown. Generally, the agents penetrate most body tissues and fluids well. Moxalactam and cefotaxime and possibly ceftriaxone effectively penetrate into the cerebrospinal fluid well. The third-generation cephalosporins have become the accepted drugs of choice for the treatment of adult gram-negative bacillary meningitis; as more experience is gained, they are likely to become the drugs of first choice for neonatal (with ampicillin) and childhood (except for moxalactam) meningitis. Serious infections of Enterobacteriaceae can be treated with these agents, thereby avoiding use of the aminoglycosides. Moxalactam is comparable with combination therapy in treating intra-abdominal infections. Adverse effects associated with use of the third-generation cephalosporins are generally similar to those that occur with other beta-lactam antibiotics with the exception of coagulopathies and the disulfiram reaction seen with moxalactam and cefoperazone. Despite the relatively high cost of the third-generation cephalosporins, they are often cost effective because of their reduced dosing frequencies, broad spectra of activity, and effectiveness in serious infections for which more toxic antibiotics have been required in the past.

摘要

对六种第三代头孢菌素——头孢噻肟、拉氧头孢、头孢哌酮、头孢唑肟、头孢曲松和头孢甲肟进行了综述;内容涵盖化学结构与构效关系、作用机制、活性谱、药代动力学、临床应用、不良反应以及成本效益。第三代头孢菌素的作用机制与其他β-内酰胺类抗生素相似。这些药物对某些革兰氏阳性菌,包括耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌,均无特别显著的活性;但对淋球菌、流感嗜血杆菌和脑膜炎奈瑟菌有效。几种常见的革兰氏阴性病原体对第三代头孢菌素敏感,包括大肠杆菌、克雷伯菌、异型枸橼酸杆菌、变形杆菌和摩根菌。约50%的铜绿假单胞菌分离株对其敏感。只有拉氧头孢对脆弱拟杆菌有良好活性。这六种药物的药代动力学特征显示出一些重要差异。头孢曲松的半衰期使得许多患者可以每日给药一次;头孢唑肟和头孢哌酮的半衰期允许每8 - 12小时给药一次。头孢哌酮和头孢曲松与蛋白的结合率很高,但其临床意义尚不清楚。一般来说,这些药物能很好地穿透大多数身体组织和体液。拉氧头孢、头孢噻肟以及可能还有头孢曲松能有效穿透进入脑脊液。第三代头孢菌素已成为治疗成人革兰氏阴性杆菌脑膜炎的公认首选药物;随着经验的积累,它们很可能成为新生儿(与氨苄西林联用)和儿童(除拉氧头孢外)脑膜炎的首选药物。肠杆菌科的严重感染可用这些药物治疗,从而避免使用氨基糖苷类药物。拉氧头孢在治疗腹腔内感染方面与联合治疗相当。与使用第三代头孢菌素相关的不良反应通常与其他β-内酰胺类抗生素相似,不过拉氧头孢和头孢哌酮会出现凝血障碍和双硫仑样反应。尽管第三代头孢菌素成本相对较高,但由于其给药频率降低、活性谱广,且对过去需要使用毒性更大抗生素治疗的严重感染有效,所以它们往往具有成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验