De Backer G G, Zenner R, Kornitzer M, Clement D L, Dramaix M M
J Electrocardiol. 1983 Jul;16(3):307-11. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(83)80011-9.
The prevalence rates of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) were studied in a middle-aged male working population using the Minnesota code, an automated processing of the orthogonal leads, and the Pipberger program. These various methods resulted in significant differences in prevalence rates. The odds ratios and relative differences were calculated for each method in subgroups according to the presence or absence of personal antecedents of arterial hypertension. For detecting LVH, the orthogonal criteria are superior to the other methods. The concordances between methods are low overall, leaving the question open as to the independent prognostic value of each method.
利用明尼苏达编码、正交导联自动处理以及皮普伯格程序，对中年男性工作人群的左心室肥厚（LVH）患病率进行了研究。这些不同方法导致患病率存在显著差异。根据是否有动脉高血压个人病史，计算了各亚组中每种方法的优势比和相对差异。对于检测LVH，正交标准优于其他方法。各方法之间的总体一致性较低，这使得每种方法的独立预后价值问题悬而未决。
