Anger K, Erbel R, Krebs W, Meyer J, Möller T, Schweizer P, Yalkinoglu O
Rofo. 1983 Nov;139(5):487-94. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1055933.
38 patients with clinically suspected coronary artery disease were studied by contrast ventriculography, 2-dimensional echocardiography and multiple gated blood pool imaging (MUGA) without stress. The results were compared with each other and with the final diagnosis confirmed by coronary angiography. The left ventricular ejection fraction is evaluated nearly identically and with sufficient accuracy by both non-invasive methods, local motion abnormalities are on the other hand diagnosed in the best way by MUGA imaging in our own cases.
对38例临床疑似冠心病患者进行了无负荷状态下的对比心室造影、二维超声心动图和多门控心血池显像（MUGA）研究。将这些结果相互比较，并与经冠状动脉造影证实的最终诊断结果进行比较。两种非侵入性方法对左心室射血分数的评估几乎相同且准确性足够，另一方面，在我们自己的病例中，MUGA显像对局部运动异常的诊断效果最佳。
