• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众对弱势群体护理的偏好。

Public preferences for the care of dependency groups.

作者信息

West P, Illsley R, Kelman H

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 1984;18(4):287-95. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(84)90117-5.

DOI:10.1016/0277-9536(84)90117-5
PMID:6230724
Abstract

In the context of the continuing debate about how responsibility for the care of the disabled, chronically sick and elderly (collectively termed dependency groups) should be allocated as between the family and state and informal and formal caring agencies, this paper reports the basic findings of a survey of care preferences advocated by the public in three locations in Scotland, an urban metropolis, a large city and a small town in a rural setting. The results show that while there is little difference in preference patterns between the locations the public is discriminating in its support for care arrangements for patient/client groups with age-related physical and mental impairment. Overall, there is considerable support for a range of services termed community based professional care--day care centres, day hospitals and in respect of the elderly, sheltered housing. Residential care is less often preferred with the notable exception of senile dementia. Similarly, there is only limited support for informal care without professional involvement. The public, it seems, are not inclined to allocate the major responsibility for the care of dependency groups to the family and close kin preferring instead a continued policy of partnership between informal care systems and the welfare state in which the former does not replace the latter.

摘要

在关于如何在家庭与国家以及非正式和正式照料机构之间分配对残疾人、慢性病患者和老年人(统称为依赖群体)的照料责任的持续辩论背景下,本文报告了一项在苏格兰三个地点(一个大都市、一个大城市和一个乡村小镇)对公众所倡导的照料偏好进行调查的基本结果。结果表明,虽然不同地点之间的偏好模式差异不大,但公众在支持为患有与年龄相关的身心障碍的患者/客户群体提供照料安排方面存在差异。总体而言,公众对一系列被称为基于社区的专业照料服务——日托中心、日间医院以及针对老年人的庇护住房,给予了相当大的支持。除了老年痴呆症这一显著例外,人们较少倾向于选择寄宿照料。同样,对于没有专业人员参与的非正式照料,支持也较为有限。看来,公众并不倾向于将照料依赖群体的主要责任分配给家庭和近亲,而是更倾向于非正式照料系统与福利国家之间持续的伙伴关系政策,即前者不会取代后者。

相似文献

1
Public preferences for the care of dependency groups.公众对弱势群体护理的偏好。
Soc Sci Med. 1984;18(4):287-95. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(84)90117-5.
2
[Hygienic aspects with regard to nursing of home care patients with AIDS, chronic diseases and mental handicaps].[艾滋病、慢性病及智力障碍居家护理患者的卫生护理要点]
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1995 Apr;197(1-3):26-44.
3
New directions in nursing home ethics.养老院伦理的新方向。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1991 Mar-Apr;21(2 Suppl):S1-15.
4
Gender disparities in the receipt of home care for elderly people with disability in the United States.美国残疾老年人接受家庭护理方面的性别差异。
JAMA. 2000 Dec 20;284(23):3022-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.23.3022.
5
Disability, support and long-term social care of an elderly Spanish population, 2008-2009: an epidemiologic analysis.2008-2009 年西班牙老年人群的残疾、支持和长期社会护理:一项流行病学分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jan 9;16(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0498-2.
6
Disability and dependency in elderly people in residential and hospital care.
Age Ageing. 1988 May;17(3):147-54. doi: 10.1093/ageing/17.3.147.
7
Care arrangements for community-dwelling people with dementia in Germany as perceived by informal carers - a cross-sectional pilot survey in a provincial-rural setting.德国非专业护理人员所感知的社区痴呆患者护理安排——一项省级农村地区的横断面试点调查
Health Soc Care Community. 2016 May;24(3):283-96. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12202. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
8
Factors associated with the amount of public home care received by elderly and intellectually disabled individuals in a large Norwegian municipality.挪威一个大市政当局中与老年人和智障人士接受的公共家庭护理量相关的因素。
Health Soc Care Community. 2016 May;24(3):297-308. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12209. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
9
How costly is it to care for disabled elders in a community setting?在社区环境中照料残疾老年人的成本有多高?
Gerontologist. 1995 Dec;35(6):803-13. doi: 10.1093/geront/35.6.803.
10
Intergenerational transfers and informal care for disabled elderly persons in China: evidence from CHARLS.中国残疾老年人的代际转移与非正式照料:来自中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS)的证据
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 Jul;25(4):1364-1374. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12441. Epub 2017 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Culturally sensitive active ageing seen through the lens of the welfare theory of health: assistant nurses' views.从健康福利理论视角看具有文化敏感性的积极老龄化:助理护士的观点
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 11;14:1161688. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1161688. eCollection 2023.
2
Vignette methodology and culture-relevance: lessons learned through a project on successful aging with Iranian immigrants to Sweden.案例研究方法与文化相关性:通过一项针对移民到瑞典的伊朗老年人成功老龄化项目所汲取的经验教训。
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2009 Mar;24(1):93-114. doi: 10.1007/s10823-009-9095-9.
3
Community care for demented and non-demented elderly people: a comparison study of financial burden, service use, and unmet needs in family supporters.
痴呆和非痴呆老年人的社区护理:家庭支持者的经济负担、服务使用及未满足需求的比较研究
BMJ. 1995 Jun 10;310(6993):1503-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6993.1503.