Anderson D C, Stoesz P A, Kaufmann A F
Am J Epidemiol. 1978 Feb;107(2):140-8. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112516.
In June 1976, 28 employees of a Nebraska poultry processing plant had clinical onset of an illness compatible with psittacosis. The diagnosis was serologically confirmed in 22 patients by fourfold or greater changes in their complement fixation antibody titers, using a Chlamydia group antigen. Lack of serologic response in the remaining patients could not be readily explained by therapy differences, timing of serologic evaluation, or severity of clinical illness. The comparable attack rates in the various processing departments were consistent with an airborne infection. However, results of the investigation also suggested that workers having both frequent contact with turkey tissues and skin injuries were more likely to be infected than other processing workers. The cost of the outbreak for reimbursed medical costs, workmen's compensation, and lost wages was $19,000. A single turkey flock was implicated as the source of infection. This flock had been screened on a voluntary basis for evidence of infection prior to slaughter, using criteria developed by the United States Department of Agriculture. Although the preslaughter screening failed to detect psittacosis infection, two turkeys from the same flock which inadvertently had not been sent to slaught were subsequently found to be infected.
1976年6月,内布拉斯加州一家家禽加工厂的28名员工出现了与鹦鹉热相符的临床症状。通过使用衣原体属抗原,对22名患者进行补体结合抗体效价四倍或更高倍数变化的检测,血清学确诊了该疾病。其余患者缺乏血清学反应,这不能轻易地用治疗差异、血清学评估时间或临床疾病严重程度来解释。各个加工部门相当的发病率与空气传播感染一致。然而,调查结果还表明,与火鸡组织频繁接触且有皮肤损伤的工人比其他加工工人更容易感染。此次疫情的报销医疗费用、工伤赔偿和工资损失成本为19,000美元。一群火鸡被认定为感染源。这群火鸡在屠宰前曾根据美国农业部制定的标准进行过自愿感染证据筛查。尽管屠宰前筛查未能检测到鹦鹉热感染,但后来发现同一群中两只无意中未被送去屠宰的火鸡被感染了。