Brown J M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1984 Mar;10(3):425-9. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(84)90063-4.
The lack of positive results from the clinical trials undertaken so far with misonidazole (MISO) are widely considered as disappointing. This is leading to a growing sentiment that hypoxic cells may not be a significant limitation to local control of human tumors. To examine whether this is a reasonable conclusion, the relevant in vitro and in vivo data have been summarized so that predictions of the extent of radiosensitization of the hypoxic cells can be made from a knowledge of the clinically achievable levels of MISO. This analysis shows the following: First, the original curve of Adams with V-79 cells is probably over-optimistic in predicting sensitizer enhancement ratios (SERs). A new curve based on the available in vivo data predicts lower sensitization so that even at the highest MISO doses used clinically, SERs for the hypoxic cells to large single X-ray doses of only 1.45 would be expected. In a clinical trial, reoxygenation of the hypoxic cells is likely to occur, thereby considerably reducing the SER for the total tumor cell population. This, together with the problems of heterogeneous tumors and insufficient patient numbers, could well have been responsible for the negative clinical results. Second, even if tumor levels of the new radiosensitizer SR-2508 10 times those of MISO can be achieved clinically, this will still not lead to full radiosensitization of the hypoxic cells (although an SER in excess of 2.0 should be attainable). In conclusion the in vitro and in vivo data with radiosensitizers suggest that only a small effect, if any, is likely to be demonstrated in the clinical trials with MISO, even for those tumors the control of which is limited by hypoxic cells. Thus the question of whether hypoxic cells may or may not limit the local control of tumors by radiotherapy has not been addressed adequately by the presently available radiosensitizing drugs.
到目前为止,米索硝唑(MISO)临床试验缺乏阳性结果被广泛认为令人失望。这导致一种越来越强烈的观点,即缺氧细胞可能并非人类肿瘤局部控制的重大限制因素。为了检验这是否是一个合理的结论,已对相关的体外和体内数据进行了总结,以便根据临床可达到的MISO水平来预测缺氧细胞的放射增敏程度。该分析表明:首先,亚当斯针对V - 79细胞的原始曲线在预测增敏剂增强比(SERs)时可能过于乐观。基于现有体内数据的新曲线预测增敏效果较低,以至于即使在临床使用的最高MISO剂量下,缺氧细胞对大剂量单次X射线照射的SERs预计也仅为1.45。在临床试验中,缺氧细胞可能会发生再氧合,从而大大降低整个肿瘤细胞群体的SERs。这一点,再加上肿瘤异质性和患者数量不足的问题,很可能是导致临床结果为阴性的原因。其次,即使临床上能够使新型放射增敏剂SR - 2508在肿瘤中的水平达到MISO的10倍,这仍不会导致缺氧细胞完全放射增敏(尽管SERs超过2.0应该是可以实现的)。总之,放射增敏剂的体外和体内数据表明,即使对于那些其控制受缺氧细胞限制的肿瘤,在使用MISO的临床试验中也可能仅显示出很小的效果(如果有效果的话)。因此,目前可用的放射增敏药物尚未充分解决缺氧细胞是否会限制放疗对肿瘤的局部控制这一问题。