Affleck G G, Peszke M A, Wintrob R M
Am J Psychiatry. 1978 Feb;135(2):205-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.135.2.205.
The authors sent out questionnaires regarding knowledge of statutes governing emergency involuntary hospitalization to psychiatrists in Connecticut and in the District of Columbia. Fifty-five percent (N=207) of the sample in Connecticut and 25% (N=87) of the sample in the District of Columbia responded. The responses showed that few of these psychiatrists had a thorough familiarity with the legal statutes governing emergency involuntary hospitalization in their jurisdictions. The most frequently cited criterion was the dangerousness standard, especially in the District of Columbia sample, and many psychiatrists were not sure of the nature of their statutory authority when their patients met the criteria for emergency hospitalization.
作者向康涅狄格州和哥伦比亚特区的精神科医生发放了关于紧急非自愿住院相关法规知识的调查问卷。康涅狄格州样本中有55%(N = 207)做出回应,哥伦比亚特区样本中有25%(N = 87)做出回应。调查结果显示,这些精神科医生中很少有人对其所在辖区内关于紧急非自愿住院的法律法规有透彻的了解。最常被提及的标准是危险性标准,尤其是在哥伦比亚特区的样本中,而且当他们的患者符合紧急住院标准时,许多精神科医生并不确定自己法定权限的性质。