• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

紧急非自愿住院在法定适用性与临床必要性方面的认知差异

Perceived statutory applicability versus clinical desirability of emergency involuntary hospitalization.

作者信息

Peszke M A, Affleck G G, Wintrob R M

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 1980 Apr;137(4):476-80. doi: 10.1176/ajp.137.4.476.

DOI:10.1176/ajp.137.4.476
PMID:7361937
Abstract

The authors used a questionnaire survey conducted by mail in 1975 to assess psychiatrists' perceptions of the applicability of two jurisdictions' statutes for emergency involuntary hospitalization and the desirability of such hospitalization in four case vignettes. The great majority of the 287 respondents agreed that the statutes were applicable and hospitalization was desirable for individuals who were at risk for suicide and who were psychotic. Most of them also agreed that such hospitalization was neither legally applicable nor desirable for nonpsychotic, nonsuicidal people. Their perceptions of applicability versus desirability differed, however, regarding people who were nonsuicidal but psychotic or nonpsychotic but suicidal.

摘要

作者们使用了1975年通过邮件进行的一项问卷调查,以评估精神科医生对两个司法管辖区关于紧急非自愿住院法规的适用性的看法,以及在四个病例 vignettes 中这种住院治疗的可取性。287名受访者中的绝大多数人认为,对于有自杀风险和患有精神病的个人,这些法规适用且住院治疗是可取的。他们中的大多数人还认为,对于非精神病、非自杀的人来说,这种住院治疗在法律上既不适用也不可取。然而,对于非自杀但患有精神病或非精神病但有自杀倾向的人,他们对适用性与可取性的看法有所不同。

相似文献

1
Perceived statutory applicability versus clinical desirability of emergency involuntary hospitalization.紧急非自愿住院在法定适用性与临床必要性方面的认知差异
Am J Psychiatry. 1980 Apr;137(4):476-80. doi: 10.1176/ajp.137.4.476.
2
Emergency psychiatric involuntary detention: a California experience.紧急精神科非自愿拘留:加利福尼亚的经验
Crit Care Update. 1980 Jan;7(1):32-5.
3
Psychiatrists' familiarity with legal statutes governing emergency involuntary hospitalization.精神科医生对有关紧急非自愿住院治疗的法律法规的熟悉程度。
Am J Psychiatry. 1978 Feb;135(2):205-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.135.2.205.
4
Changes in the law have improved treatment of the mentally ill.法律的变革改善了对精神病患者的治疗。
Hospitals. 1981 May 1;55(9):61-4.
5
Emergency involuntary commitment: a look at the decision-making process.紧急非自愿住院治疗:审视决策过程。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1983 Mar;34(3):249-54. doi: 10.1176/ps.34.3.249.
6
[Psychiatric legislation must consider the reality. The large group of persons with schizophrenia is stigmatized by the crimes only a few commit].精神科立法必须考虑现实情况。大量精神分裂症患者群体因少数患者实施的犯罪行为而被污名化。
Lakartidningen. 2004 Jan 8;101(1-2):126-7.
7
Consultant psychiatrists' knowledge of mental health legislation in Scotland.苏格兰精神科顾问医生对心理健康立法的了解。
Med Sci Law. 1998 Jul;38(3):237-41. doi: 10.1177/002580249803800310.
8
[Initial experiences in psychiatric emergency service. Comments on the prevention or indication of compulsory hospitalization in accordance with the Hamburg Law on Aid and Protective Measures in Mental Diseases (author's transl)].[精神科急诊服务的初步经验。根据汉堡《精神疾病救助与保护措施法》对强制住院治疗的预防或指征的评论(作者译)]
Psychiatr Prax. 1981 Feb;8(1):18-24.
9
Decision makers in law and psychiatry and the involuntary civil commitment process.法律和精神病学领域的决策者以及非自愿民事住院程序。
Community Ment Health J. 1981 Summer;17(2):114-22. doi: 10.1007/BF00754357.
10
Dilemmas related to compulsory admission: a case report.
Psychiatr Danub. 2007 Dec;19(4):303-5.