Musselwhite C R, Ruscello D M
J Speech Hear Res. 1984 Sep;27(3):436-43. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2703.436.
This investigation studied the transparency or guessability of communication symbols from three widely used systems-Blissymbols, Picsyms, and Rebus. Symbol transparency was assessed across four age groups through a forced-choice identification task which contained Word, Phrase, and Sentence subtests. Significant differences were found in both Word subtest and Total test scores for the variables of symbol system and chronological age. Subjects across all age groups performed similarly in response to the Picsyms and Rebus symbol items but significantly more poorly when identifying Blissymbols. In addition, there appeared to be a developmental progression for the Picsym and Rebus symbol tests, but the same trend did not emerge for the Blissymbol test. The feature of symbol transparency, as measured through a forced-choice identification task, discriminated among symbol systems. Significantly fewer symbols from the Bliss system were found to be transparent when compared with Picsym and Rebus systems.
本研究调查了三种广泛使用的符号系统——布利斯符号、图片符号和画谜的透明度或可猜测性。通过一项包含单词、短语和句子子测试的强制选择识别任务,对四个年龄组的符号透明度进行了评估。在符号系统和实足年龄变量的单词子测试和总测试分数中均发现了显著差异。所有年龄组的受试者在对图片符号和画谜符号项目的反应上表现相似,但在识别布利斯符号时明显较差。此外,图片符号和画谜符号测试似乎存在发展进程,但布利斯符号测试未出现相同趋势。通过强制选择识别任务测量的符号透明度特征在不同符号系统之间存在差异。与图片符号和画谜符号系统相比,布利斯系统中被发现具有透明度的符号明显更少。