Nürnberger N
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1984 Sep 14;96(17):656-8.
Urinary flow velocity and urinary peak flow rate were measured in 41 boys. Using combined urodynamic and radiological methods 23 boys showed proximal and/or distal urethral obstruction, whilst 18 boys had no signs of subvesical obstructions. The peak flow rate alone does not discriminate reliably between the normal and abnormal population. Many boys with normal flow rates showed subvesical obstruction on measurement of the peak urinary velocity. In spite of the fact that flow velocity determination alone only partially discriminated between the different groups, in combination with uroflowmetry it proved to be a valuable secondary non-invasive parameter. The flow velocity vs. flow rate diagram is shown to be a good tool for the urodynamic classification of boys with subvesical obstruction.
对41名男孩测量了尿流速度和尿峰流率。采用尿动力学和放射学相结合的方法,23名男孩显示近端和/或远端尿道梗阻,而18名男孩没有膀胱下梗阻的迹象。仅尿峰流率不能可靠地区分正常人群和异常人群。许多尿流率正常的男孩在测量尿峰速度时显示有膀胱下梗阻。尽管仅尿流速度测定只能部分区分不同组,但与尿流率测定相结合,它被证明是一个有价值的二级非侵入性参数。流速与流率图被证明是对膀胱下梗阻男孩进行尿动力学分类的良好工具。