Dhingra R C, Deedwania P C, Cummings J M, Amat-Y-Leon F, Wu D, Denes P, Rosen K M
Circulation. 1978 Mar;57(3):448-54. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.57.3.448.
Electrophysiological studies were conducted in 13 patients with normal sinus node function and 14 with sinus node dysfunction before and after intravenous lidocaine. Mean +/- SEM sinus cycle length significantly shortened from 810 +/- 34.3 to 774 +/- 34.3 msec in patients with normal sinus node (P less than 0.001) and from 1061 +/- 67.6 to 1016 +/- 64.5 msec in patients with sinus node dysfunction (P less than 0.025) after lidocaine. Mean sinus recovery time was 1027 +/- 49.4 before and 1026 +/- 52.5 msec after lidocaine in patients with normal sinus node (NS) and 1269 +/- 97.7 before and 1170 +/- 73.8 msec after lidocaine in patients with sinus node dysfunction (P less than 0.05). Mean calculated sinoatrial conduction time was 87 +/- 9.5 before and 90 +/- 9.2 msec after lidocaine in patients with normal sinus node (NS) and 80 +/- 10.3 before and 96 +/- 10.2 msec after lidocaine in patients with sinus node dysfunction (P less than 0.001). Mean atrial effective and functional refractory periods were not significantly changed with lidocaine. Thus lidocaine shortened sinus cycle length in both groups, without affecting atrial refractoriness. Lidocaine appeared to depress perinodal tissue only in patients with sinus node dysfunction. The abbreviation of sinus recovery time in patients with sinus node dysfunction could reflect increased sinus automaticity and/or increased perinodal refractoriness, allowing entrance block to occur. This mechanism may explain why sinus arrest has been noted in some patients during lidocaine administration.
对13例窦房结功能正常的患者和14例窦房结功能障碍的患者在静脉注射利多卡因前后进行了电生理研究。窦房结功能正常的患者,平均±标准误窦房结周期长度从810±34.3毫秒显著缩短至774±34.3毫秒(P<0.001);窦房结功能障碍的患者,利多卡因注射后从1061±67.6毫秒缩短至1016±64.5毫秒(P<0.025)。窦房结功能正常的患者,利多卡因注射前平均窦房结恢复时间为1027±49.4毫秒,注射后为1026±52.5毫秒;窦房结功能障碍的患者,利多卡因注射前平均窦房结恢复时间为1269±97.7毫秒,注射后为1170±73.8毫秒(P<0.05)。窦房结功能正常的患者,利多卡因注射前平均计算的窦房传导时间为87±9.5毫秒,注射后为90±9.2毫秒;窦房结功能障碍的患者,利多卡因注射前平均计算的窦房传导时间为80±10.3毫秒,注射后为96±10.2毫秒(P<0.001)。利多卡因对平均心房有效不应期和功能不应期无显著影响。因此,利多卡因使两组患者的窦房结周期长度均缩短,且不影响心房不应期。利多卡因似乎仅对窦房结功能障碍的患者的结周组织有抑制作用。窦房结功能障碍患者窦房结恢复时间的缩短可能反映窦房结自律性增加和/或结周不应期增加,从而导致传入阻滞。这一机制可能解释了为何在利多卡因给药期间部分患者出现窦性停搏。