Suppr超能文献

失忆症患者不会遗忘的信息。

The information that amnesic patients do not forget.

作者信息

Graf P, Squire L R, Mandler G

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1984 Jan;10(1):164-78. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.10.1.164.

Abstract

The performance of three kinds of amnesic patients and control subjects was assessed using four methods for testing memory: free recall, recognition, cued recall, and word completion. Whereas amnesic patients were impaired on free recall, recognition, and cued recall, they were normal on word completion. Moreover, performance on the word-completion test declined at a normal rate reaching chance after about 120 min. The word-completion test resembled the cued-recall test in that the initial letters of previously presented words were given as cues. It differed from cued recall only in the instructions, which directed subjects away from the memory aspects of the test and asked them to complete each three-letter cue with the first word that came to mind. The present results offer an explanation of conflicting findings that have been obtained with amnesic patients on tests of the cued-recall type. The results are considered in terms of a process (activation or procedural learning), which is spared in amnesia and not dependent on the integrity of the damaged brain regions.

摘要

使用四种记忆测试方法对三类失忆症患者和对照组受试者的表现进行了评估

自由回忆、识别、线索回忆和单词补全。失忆症患者在自由回忆、识别和线索回忆方面受损,但在单词补全方面表现正常。此外,单词补全测试的表现以正常速度下降,大约120分钟后达到随机水平。单词补全测试与线索回忆测试相似,因为之前呈现单词的首字母被用作线索。它与线索回忆的不同之处仅在于指导语,指导语使受试者偏离测试的记忆方面,并要求他们用脑海中出现的第一个单词完成每个三个字母的线索。目前的结果为在失忆症患者的线索回忆类型测试中获得的相互矛盾的发现提供了解释。这些结果是根据一个过程(激活或程序学习)来考虑的,这个过程在失忆症中未受影响,并且不依赖于受损脑区的完整性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验