Squire L R, Shimamura A P, Graf P
Neuropsychologia. 1987;25(1B):195-210. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(87)90131-x.
In three separate experiments, we assessed the strength and duration of word completion effects in amnesic patients and two control groups. In Experiment 1 subjects studied words under a semantic orienting condition and were given tests of word completion and recognition memory after an immediate, 2-hr or 4-day delay. In the word completion test for Experiment 1, we presented three-letter word stems that could be completed to form several common words, one of which had been presented previously (e.g. MOT for MOTEL), and subjects completed each stem with the first word that came to mind. Priming effects were equivalent in amnesic patients and control subjects and they reached baseline levels within 2 hr. In Experiments 2 and 3, subjects studied words under either a semantic or a nonsemantic orienting condition, and word completion was tested at the same three delays using cues that uniquely specified the study words (e.g. JUI for JUICE; or A--A--In for ASSASSIN). In these experiments, amnesic patients exhibited both smaller and shorter lasting word completion effects than control subjects. Specifically, amnesic patients exhibited word completion effects that seldom lasted as long as 2 hr, whereas control subjects usually exhibited completion effects lasting 4 days. An important additional finding was that control subjects exhibited larger and longer-lasting word completion effects when tested under the semantic orienting condition than when tested under the nonsemantic orienting condition. Amnesic patients were not affected by this manipulation. Moreover, under the nonsemantic orienting condition, control subjects and amnesic patients performed similarly. The results show that word completion performance is not always fully intact in amnesic patients. Long-lasting word completion effects found in normal subjects may be mediated by declarative or elaborative retrieval processes, which are impaired in amnesic patients. If so, priming as measured by word completion methods is shorter lasting than recent studies of normal subjects would suggest.
在三个独立的实验中,我们评估了失忆症患者和两个对照组中单词补全效应的强度和持续时间。在实验1中,受试者在语义定向条件下学习单词,并在即时、延迟2小时或4天后接受单词补全和识别记忆测试。在实验1的单词补全测试中,我们呈现了由三个字母组成的词干,这些词干可以被补全以形成几个常见单词,其中一个是之前呈现过的(例如,MOT代表汽车旅馆),受试者用首先想到的单词来补全每个词干。失忆症患者和对照组受试者的启动效应相当,且在2小时内达到基线水平。在实验2和3中,受试者在语义或非语义定向条件下学习单词,并在相同的三个延迟时间使用唯一指定学习单词的线索来测试单词补全(例如,JUI代表果汁;或A--A--In代表刺客)。在这些实验中,失忆症患者表现出比对照组受试者更小且持续时间更短的单词补全效应。具体而言,失忆症患者的单词补全效应很少能持续长达2小时,而对照组受试者通常表现出持续4天的补全效应。一个重要的额外发现是,对照组受试者在语义定向条件下测试时比在非语义定向条件下测试时表现出更大且持续时间更长的单词补全效应。失忆症患者不受这种操作的影响。此外,在非语义定向条件下,对照组受试者和失忆症患者的表现相似。结果表明,失忆症患者的单词补全表现并不总是完全完好无损。在正常受试者中发现的持久单词补全效应可能由陈述性或精细检索过程介导,而失忆症患者的这些过程受损。如果是这样,通过单词补全方法测量的启动效应持续时间比最近对正常受试者的研究所表明的要短。