Hunt R Reed, Smith Rebekah E, Toth Jeffrey P
Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at San Antonio.
Department of Psychology, The University of North Carolina at Wilmington.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Mar;42(3):339-50. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000136. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
The experiments reported here were designed to replicate and extend McCabe, Roediger, and Karpicke's (2011) finding that retrieval in category cued recall involves both controlled and automatic processes. The extension entailed identifying whether distinctive encoding affected 1 or both of these 2 processes. The first experiment successfully replicated McCabe et al., but the second, which added a critical baseline condition, produced data inconsistent with a 2 independent process model of recall. The third experiment provided evidence that retrieval in category cued recall reflects a generate-recognize strategy, with the effect of distinctive processing being localized to recognition. Overall, the data suggest that category cued recall evokes a generate-recognize retrieval strategy and that the subprocesses underlying this strategy can be dissociated as a function of distinctive versus relational encoding processes.
此处报告的实验旨在重复并扩展麦凯布、罗迪格和卡皮克（2011年）的研究发现，即在类别线索回忆中的检索涉及受控和自动过程。扩展内容包括确定独特编码是否影响这两个过程中的一个或两个。第一个实验成功重复了麦凯布等人的研究，但第二个实验增加了一个关键的基线条件，得出的数据与回忆的双独立过程模型不一致。第三个实验提供了证据，表明类别线索回忆中的检索反映了一种生成-识别策略，独特加工的效果局限于识别。总体而言，数据表明类别线索回忆引发了一种生成-识别检索策略，并且该策略背后的子过程可以根据独特与关系编码过程而分离。
