Ruschke R
Zentralbl Bakteriol B Hyg Krankenhaushyg Betriebshyg Prav Med. 1980 Feb;170(1-2):143-84.
Many legal regulations exist on the hygienic-microbiological properties of food products. The 'Länder-Speiseeisverordnungen' (County Ice Cream Regulations), the 'Diät-Verordnung' (Dietary Regulation) and the 'Trinkwasser-Verordnung' (Regulation on Potable Water) are examples for the frequent inadequacies inherent in these regulations. Caution is indicated against any new proposals for the establishment of additional hygienic-microbiological regulations without sufficient practice-related reasoning unless a revision and improvement of inadequate, already existing regulations has been carried out. Practicable procedures have to be prepared not only to maintain the hygiene in Catering facilities, but also for the evaluation of food products and raw materials according to hygienic-microbiological criteria: Although commonly assumed, the 'Microbe Counts' alone are not sufficient for the determination of the hygienic conditions. Therefore, inspite of all the weak points inherent in quality control procedures - e. g. possible sick, co-workers, only random sample control of raw material supplies - such adapted systems (good manufacturing practice) have to be enforced with special emphasis on the economy of the control expenditure, interdisciplinary aspects, governmental control and consumer information. Examples from literature and own experience demonstrate that the importance of the 'Fecal Indicators' for the judgement of 'hygienic conditions' in food production are rather limited and a correct evaluation only by 'Bacterial Plate Counts' is not possible due to the variation of germ density within one sample. Microbiological investigations of food products according to statistic rules require such an expenditure that they cannot generally be used as routine control procedures. A possible documentation is shown which allows - even without statistic investigations, at least retrospectively - the preparation of a survey on the microbiological properties of raw materials generally available on the market and which makes it possible to recognize and reject any unqualified microbiological limiting value requirements.
关于食品的卫生微生物特性存在许多法律法规。《州冰淇淋法规》《饮食法规》和《饮用水法规》就是这些法规中经常存在不足的例子。除非对已存在的不充分法规进行修订和完善,否则对于任何没有充分实践相关依据就提出的制定额外卫生微生物法规的新提议,都应谨慎对待。不仅要制定切实可行的程序来维持餐饮设施的卫生,还要根据卫生微生物标准对食品和原材料进行评估:虽然通常认为仅“微生物计数”就足以确定卫生状况,但实际上并非如此。因此,尽管质量控制程序存在诸多弱点——例如,可能患病的同事、仅对原材料供应进行随机抽样控制等——但仍必须实施这种经过调整的系统(良好生产规范),特别要强调控制成本的经济性、跨学科问题、政府监管和消费者信息。文献和自身经验中的例子表明,“粪便指示菌”在判断食品生产中的“卫生状况”方面的重要性相当有限,而且由于一个样本中细菌密度的变化,仅通过“细菌平板计数”进行正确评估是不可能的。按照统计规则对食品进行微生物调查所需的成本很高,以至于通常不能将其用作常规控制程序。展示了一种可能的文件记录,它即使在没有统计调查的情况下,至少在回顾时也能对市场上普遍可得的原材料的微生物特性进行调查,并能够识别和拒绝任何不合格的微生物限值要求。