Wolff J A, Breslow N, Sinks L
Cancer Clin Trials. 1980 Summer;3(2):121-5.
This report evaluates the outcome in patients treated in accord with protocol requirements of the National Wilms' Tumor Study who were assigned incorrectly to any of several clinical groups because of mistaken initial assessments of the extent of disease. A significant difference in response was found between patients correctly staged Group I and those of higher stages incorrectly placed in Group I. This observation emphasizes the need for careful staging, and for "upstaging" in doubtful Group I patients.
本报告评估了按照国家肾母细胞瘤研究方案要求接受治疗的患者的治疗结果,这些患者由于对疾病范围的初始评估错误而被错误地分配到几个临床组中的任何一组。在正确分期为I期的患者与错误地归为I期的更高分期患者之间发现了反应上的显著差异。这一观察结果强调了仔细分期的必要性,以及对可疑的I期患者进行“上调分期”的必要性。