Suppr超能文献

胍法辛与可乐定对犬的外周效应比较。

Peripheral effects of guanfacine compared to those of clonidine in the dog.

作者信息

Hashimoto K, Nakagawa Y, Hashimoto T, Tsukada T, Takeda K, Imai S

出版信息

Jpn Circ J. 1980 Nov;44(11):883-92. doi: 10.1253/jcj.44.883.

Abstract

Comparative studies of the antihypertensive agents, guanfacine and clonidine, on their peripheral effects were performed using normotensive canine preparations. On the peripheral vascular beds, both drugs constricted cerebral renal and femoral vasculatures, but there were no decreases in the renal blood flow. This vasoconstriction was blocked by phentolamine, and guanfacine was about 3 times less potent than clonidine. Both drugs contracted the canine nictitating membrane, and had no effect on the ganglionic transmission in the cervical sympathetic ganglion. Qualitatively different effects were observed in their effects on renal function. Guanfacine slightly increased the urinary volume and Na excretion, while clonidine increased the urinary volume and K excretion. All these peripheral effects do not seem to be responsible for their hypotensive effect.

摘要

使用血压正常的犬类制剂,对降压药胍法辛和可乐定的外周效应进行了比较研究。在周围血管床方面,两种药物均使脑、肾和股血管收缩,但肾血流量未减少。这种血管收缩被酚妥拉明阻断,胍法辛的效力约为可乐定的三分之一。两种药物均使犬瞬膜收缩,且对颈交感神经节的神经节传递无影响。在它们对肾功能的影响方面观察到了质的不同。胍法辛使尿量和钠排泄略有增加,而可乐定使尿量和钾排泄增加。所有这些外周效应似乎都不是它们降压作用的原因。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验