Tunnicliff G, Smith J A
J Neurochem. 1981 Mar;36(3):1122-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1981.tb01708.x.
Several Good buffers (MOPS, ACES, BES, HEPES, ADA, and PIPES) competitively inhibited both high-affinity and low-affinity [3H]gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor binding to rat brain synaptic membranes. The most potent inhibitor was MOPS, which had Ki values of 180 nM and 79 nM for the high- and low-affinity binding sites, respectively. HEPES had Ki values of 2.25 mM and 115 microM. The buffers had no appreciable effect on sodium-dependent GABA binding or on gamma-aminobutyrate aminotransferase activity. Surprisingly, the buffers were extremely ineffectual as inhibitors of either high- or low-affinity [3H]muscimol binding. Indeed, they were of the order of 10(5) times less effective in this case than against [3H]GABA binding. These results clearly show (a) that the use of such buffers as MOPS or HEPES should be avoided in studying the interaction of GABA with its receptor, and (b) the binding sites of [3H]GABA and [3H]muscimol are not identical.
几种良好的缓冲液(MOPS、ACES、BES、HEPES、ADA和PIPES)竞争性抑制了高亲和力和低亲和力的[3H]γ-氨基丁酸与大鼠脑突触膜的受体结合。最有效的抑制剂是MOPS,其对高亲和力和低亲和力结合位点的Ki值分别为180 nM和79 nM。HEPES的Ki值为2.25 mM和115 μM。这些缓冲液对钠依赖性GABA结合或γ-氨基丁酸转氨酶活性没有明显影响。令人惊讶的是,这些缓冲液作为高亲和力或低亲和力[3H]蝇蕈醇结合的抑制剂极其无效。实际上,在这种情况下,它们的效力比抑制[3H]GABA结合时低约10^5倍。这些结果清楚地表明:(a)在研究GABA与其受体的相互作用时应避免使用MOPS或HEPES等缓冲液;(b)[3H]GABA和[3H]蝇蕈醇的结合位点不相同。