• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[儿童医院尿布疹的发生情况及其用凯妮汀治疗(作者译)]

[The occurrence of nappy rash at a children's hospital and its treatment with Canesten (author's transl)].

作者信息

Kellerer K, Grubbauer H M

出版信息

Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1978 Jan 6;90(1):13-6.

PMID:625982
Abstract

An unselected, mycologically-controlled trial was conducted at the University Children's Hospital of Graz on the treatment of nappy rash by the topical application of Canesten (clotrimazole), a broad-spectrum mycotic in the form of a 1% cream. 56 children, ranging in age from 3 weeks to 41/2 years, were treated for thrush, principally located in the genital area. Only some of the children were admitted primarily on account of the oral and/or perianal moniliasis. The majority of the children were hospitalized for some other reason and thrush was diagnosed as an accompanying condition. Candida albicans proved to be the most frequent pathogenic organism. The results of therapy were judged according to mycological and clinical criteria. The mycological findings became negative in 54 out of the 56 children. Clinical improvement was apparent in all cases between the 5th and 10th day of therapy; complete recovery occurred between the 5th and 25th day, depending on the extent and localization of the moniliasis. One child showed improvement in, but not recovery from the disease, because therapy was interrupted on premature discharge from hospital. Therapy was unsuccessful in the remaining child, although slight improvement occurred. Tolerance was good in all patients on application of Canesten cream thrice daily.

摘要

在格拉茨大学儿童医院进行了一项未经筛选、有真菌学对照的试验,以研究外用凯妮汀(克霉唑)(一种1%乳膏剂型的广谱抗真菌药)治疗尿布疹的效果。56名年龄在3周至4岁半的儿童因鹅口疮接受治疗,主要位于生殖器区域。只有部分儿童最初是因口腔和/或肛周念珠菌病入院。大多数儿童因其他原因住院,鹅口疮被诊断为伴随病症。白色念珠菌被证明是最常见的致病微生物。根据真菌学和临床标准对治疗结果进行判断。56名儿童中有54名真菌学检查结果转为阴性。治疗第5天至第10天所有病例均有明显临床改善;完全康复发生在第5天至第25天之间,取决于念珠菌病的范围和部位。一名儿童病情有所改善但未康复,因为因过早出院治疗中断。其余一名儿童治疗未成功,尽管有轻微改善。所有患者每日三次使用凯妮汀乳膏时耐受性良好。

相似文献

1
[The occurrence of nappy rash at a children's hospital and its treatment with Canesten (author's transl)].[儿童医院尿布疹的发生情况及其用凯妮汀治疗(作者译)]
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1978 Jan 6;90(1):13-6.
2
[Clotrimazol in the treatment of candida infections in premature and newborn children (author's transl)].克霉唑治疗早产儿和新生儿念珠菌感染(作者译)
Med Klin. 1976 Apr 9;71(15):635-9.
3
[Napkin thrush clinical picture, mycology, histology, therapy (author's transl)].[尿布疹的临床表现、真菌学、组织学、治疗(作者译)]
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1975 Mar 7;87(5):168-73.
4
Genital candidiasis: topical management with clotrimazole.生殖器念珠菌病:克霉唑局部治疗
Cutis. 1976 Apr;17(4):760-2.
5
Nappy rash: a pharmaceutical approach.尿布疹:一种药物治疗方法。
Prof Care Mother Child. 1994 Oct;4(7):219-20.
6
[Clinical evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of the ''NoAll Bimbi Pasta Trattante'' barrier cream in napkin dermatitis].“诺奥·宾比舒缓护理面巾纸专用护肤霜”用于尿布皮炎的疗效及耐受性的临床评估
Minerva Pediatr. 2007 Feb;59(1):23-8.
7
[Clinical experiences with an antimycotic foam preparation with added prednisolone (Nystacorton foam)].[含泼尼松龙的抗真菌泡沫制剂(制霉菌素可的松泡沫)的临床经验]
Padiatr Padol. 1986;21(1):75-80.
8
[Multicenter double-blind contralateral comparison of naftifin and clotrimazole cream in patients with dermatophytosis and candidiasis].
Z Hautkr. 1984 Sep 15;59(18):1209-17.
9
Comparative and non-comparative studies of the efficacy and tolerance of tioconazole cream 1% versus another imidazole and/or placebo in neonates and infants with candidal diaper rash and/or impetigo.1%噻康唑乳膏与另一种咪唑类药物和/或安慰剂治疗新生儿及婴儿念珠菌尿布疹和/或脓疱病的疗效及耐受性的对比研究与非对比研究。
J Int Med Res. 1987 Jan-Feb;15(1):23-31. doi: 10.1177/030006058701500103.
10
Clinical evaluation of clotrimazole. A broad-spectrum antifungal agent.克霉唑的临床评估。一种广谱抗真菌剂。
Arch Dermatol. 1976 Mar;112(3):350-2.