• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于检测青霉素过敏的皮肤试验。

Skin testing to detect penicillin allergy.

作者信息

Sullivan T J, Wedner H J, Shatz G S, Yecies L D, Parker C W

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1981 Sep;68(3):171-80. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(81)90180-9.

DOI:10.1016/0091-6749(81)90180-9
PMID:6267115
Abstract

Skin testing for penicillin allergy with penicillin G (Pen G), penicilloic acid (PA), and penicilloyl poly-L-lysine (PPL) was performed on 740 subjects, and the results were assessed from epidemiologic and immunologic perspectives. Approximately 95% of these patients had histories of apparent allergic reactions to beta-lactam antibiotics, and 63% were skin-test positive. The prevalence of positive skin tests was related to the time that had elapsed between clinical reactions and skin testing. Ninety-three percent were skin-test positive 7 to 12 mo after reactions, and 22% were positive 10 yr or more after reactions. Patients under 30 yr of age had a prevalence of positive skin tests 1.7-fold higher than older patients. Testing with PPL, PA, and Pen G detected 76.3%, 55.3%, and 57.1% of the positive patients, respectively. Omission of PPL, PA, or Pen G would have led to a failure to detect 25.6%, 7.2%, and 6.2% of the positive patients, respectively. Subjects with skin tests positive to penicillin often reacted to skin tests with other beta-lactam antibiotics; 73% (41 of 56) reacted to ampicillin and 51% (38 of 74) reacted to cephalothin. No serious allergic reactions were provoked by testing. None of the 83 skin test--negative patients treated with beta-lactam antibiotics immediately after testing experienced acute allergic reactions. Two patients developed mild urticaria beginning 3 and 5 days into therapy. One skin test--negative patient experienced urticaria 3 hr after receiving oral penicillin 6 mo after skin testing. This patient's skin-test status immediately before therapy was unknown. These results support the position that testing with PPL, PA, and Pen G is a rapid, safe, and effective method for identifying patients at risk, or not at risk, for allergic reactions to penicillin.

摘要

对740名受试者进行了用青霉素G(Pen G)、青霉噻唑酸(PA)和青霉噻唑酰多聚-L-赖氨酸(PPL)进行青霉素过敏皮肤试验,并从流行病学和免疫学角度评估结果。这些患者中约95%有对β-内酰胺类抗生素明显过敏反应的病史,63%皮肤试验呈阳性。皮肤试验阳性的发生率与临床反应和皮肤试验之间经过的时间有关。反应后7至12个月,93%皮肤试验呈阳性,反应后10年或更长时间,22%呈阳性。30岁以下患者皮肤试验阳性的发生率比老年患者高1.7倍。用PPL、PA和Pen G检测分别发现76.3%、55.3%和57.1%的阳性患者。省略PPL、PA或Pen G将分别导致未能检测到25.6%、7.2%和6.2%的阳性患者。对青霉素皮肤试验呈阳性的受试者经常对其他β-内酰胺类抗生素的皮肤试验有反应;73%(56例中的41例)对氨苄西林有反应,51%(74例中的38例)对头孢噻吩有反应。试验未引发严重过敏反应。83名皮肤试验阴性的患者在试验后立即接受β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗,均未出现急性过敏反应。两名患者在治疗开始后3天和5天出现轻度荨麻疹。一名皮肤试验阴性的患者在皮肤试验6个月后口服青霉素3小时后出现荨麻疹。该患者治疗前的皮肤试验状态未知。这些结果支持这样的观点,即使用PPL、PA和Pen G进行检测是一种快速、安全且有效的方法,可用于识别有或没有青霉素过敏反应风险的患者。

相似文献

1
Skin testing to detect penicillin allergy.用于检测青霉素过敏的皮肤试验。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1981 Sep;68(3):171-80. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(81)90180-9.
2
Allergy to semisynthetic penicillins in cystic fibrosis.囊性纤维化患者对半合成青霉素的过敏反应。
J Pediatr. 1984 Mar;104(3):460-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(84)81117-8.
3
Skin testing with penicilloate and penilloate prepared by an improved method: amoxicillin oral challenge in patients with negative skin test responses to penicillin reagents.采用改良方法制备的青霉素盐和青霉噻唑酸盐进行皮肤试验:对青霉素试剂皮肤试验反应阴性的患者进行阿莫西林口服激发试验。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997 Nov;100(5):586-91. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(97)70159-3.
4
Skin testing for penicillin allergy.青霉素过敏的皮肤试验
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1981 Sep;68(3):169-70. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(81)90179-2.
5
Clinical experience with penicillin skin testing in a large inner-city STD clinic.在一家大型市中心性传播疾病诊所进行青霉素皮肤试验的临床经验。
JAMA. 1993 Nov 24;270(20):2456-63.
6
Safely diagnosing clinically significant penicillin allergy using only penicilloyl-poly-lysine, penicillin, and oral amoxicillin.仅使用青霉素酰化多聚赖氨酸、青霉素和口服阿莫西林安全诊断临床显著青霉素过敏。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2013 May-Jun;1(3):258-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
7
Evaluation of adverse cutaneous reactions to aminopenicillins with emphasis on those manifested by maculopapular rashes.评估对氨基青霉素的皮肤不良反应,重点关注斑丘疹表现的不良反应。
Allergy. 1995 Feb;50(2):113-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1995.tb05066.x.
8
Penicillin allergy: clinical experience with a battery of skin-test reagents.青霉素过敏:一组皮肤试验试剂的临床经验
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1982 Feb;69(2):238-44. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(82)90105-1.
9
Antigen-specific desensitization of patients allergic to penicillin.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1982 Jun;69(6):500-8. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(82)90174-9.
10
A pilot study of penicillin skin testing in patients with a history of penicillin allergy admitted to a medical ICU.对入住内科重症监护病房且有青霉素过敏史患者进行青霉素皮肤试验的一项初步研究。
Chest. 2000 Oct;118(4):1106-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.4.1106.

引用本文的文献

1
Resensitization-Should Repeat Testing Be Performed in Patients Undergoing Penicillin Allergy Evaluations? A Pro-Con Debate.重新致敏——对正在接受青霉素过敏评估的患者应进行重复检测吗?一场正反方辩论。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2025 May;13(5):1004-1010. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.12.043. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
2
Barriers to and Facilitators of Delabelling of Antimicrobial Allergies: A Qualitative Meta-synthesis.抗菌药物过敏标签去除的障碍与促进因素:一项定性元分析
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2024 Feb 14;77(1):e3490. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.3490. eCollection 2024.
3
Penicillin allergy delabeling: Opportunities for implementation and dissemination.
青霉素过敏标签去除:实施和推广的机会。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2023 May;130(5):554-564. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2022.12.023. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
4
Management of Beta-Lactam Antibiotics Allergy: A Real-Life Study.β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏的管理:一项真实案例研究。
Front Allergy. 2022 Apr 8;3:853587. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2022.853587. eCollection 2022.
5
Discrepancies Between Patient Self-Reported and Electronic Health Record Documentation of Medication Allergies and Adverse Reactions in the Acute Care Setting: Room for Improvement.急性护理环境中患者自我报告与电子健康记录中药物过敏和不良反应记录之间的差异:改进空间。
J Pharm Technol. 2019 Aug;35(4):139-145. doi: 10.1177/8755122519840700. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
6
Frequency of severe reactions following penicillin drug provocation tests: A Bayesian meta-analysis.青霉素药物激发试验后严重反应的发生率:一项贝叶斯荟萃分析。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2021 Jun;11(4):e12008. doi: 10.1002/clt2.12008.
7
Skin Testing for Penicillin Allergy: a Review of the Literature.青霉素过敏的皮肤测试:文献综述。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2021 Mar 18;21(3):21. doi: 10.1007/s11882-021-00997-x.
8
Practical guide for evaluation and management of beta-lactam allergy: position statement from the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.β-内酰胺类药物过敏评估与管理实用指南:加拿大过敏与临床免疫学会立场声明
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2020 Nov 10;16(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13223-020-00494-2.
9
Accuracy of penicillin allergy diagnostic tests: A systematic review and meta-analysis.青霉素过敏诊断测试的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Jan;147(1):296-308. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.04.058. Epub 2020 May 21.
10
Improving Aztreonam Stewardship and Cost Through a Penicillin Allergy Testing Clinical Guideline.通过青霉素过敏试验临床指南改善氨曲南的管理与成本
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 May 5;5(6):ofy106. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy106. eCollection 2018 Jun.