Kelson J R, Shamberger R J
Clin Chem. 1978 Feb;24(2):240-4.
We compared two methods for determination of serum zinc by flame atomic absorption spectroscopy. The first involved 10-fold dilution of serum with water; the second, deproteinization of serum with trichloroacetic acid. Analytical recovery of Zn2+ added to serum averaged 99.3 and 99.9%, respectively, by the two methods, but measured concentrations were consistently greater by the second method [mean difference, 118 +/- 27 (SD) mug/liter]. For the analysis of 55 sera, measured concentrations were also greater by the second method [mean difference, 91 +/- 28 (SD) mug/liter]. We dialyzed serum to remove most of the zinc and measured analytical recovery of increasing amounts of Zn2+ added to this dialyzed serum or, conversely, of zinc in a mixture of increasing volumes of dialyzed serum in a Zn2+ standard. Recovery results for the dilution method showed an interference by an unidentified, but nondialyzable serum component(s). Recovery was not improved by use of (a) a "high-solids" burner, (b) a diluent containing 1-butanol, or (c) a Mn2+ internal standard.
我们比较了火焰原子吸收光谱法测定血清锌的两种方法。第一种方法是将血清用水稀释10倍;第二种方法是用三氯乙酸使血清脱蛋白。两种方法中,添加到血清中的Zn2+的分析回收率平均分别为99.3%和99.9%,但第二种方法测得的浓度始终更高[平均差值为118±27(标准差)μg/升]。对于55份血清的分析,第二种方法测得的浓度也更高[平均差值为91±28(标准差)μg/升]。我们对血清进行透析以去除大部分锌,并测定添加到这种透析血清中的Zn2+含量增加时的分析回收率,或者相反,测定在Zn2+标准溶液中加入体积不断增加的透析血清混合物中的锌的回收率。稀释法的回收率结果显示存在一种未鉴定但不可透析的血清成分的干扰。使用(a)“高固体”燃烧器、(b)含有1-丁醇的稀释剂或(c)锰离子内标均未提高回收率。