Goldbloom R B
Pediatr Clin North Am. 1982 Feb;29(1):151-66. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)34114-1.
Reviewing the chronological evolution of our understanding of why some children fail to thrive without obvious organic cause permits us to develop a rational contemporary approach to diagnosis and management. Originally recognized as a phenomenon of children living in institutions, it later became clear that it could occur in children living with their families. While emotional deprivation was at first emphasized as the principal determinant of growth failure, it is now apparent that the major mediating mechanism is insufficient caloric intake. Thus prior to nutritional recovery it may be difficult to segregate whether emotional symptoms in the child reflect the causes or effects of malnutrition. With rare exceptions, an etiologic diagnosis can be suspected on the basis of history, physical examination, and family assessment. Nonspecific investigative screening of such children has proved to be without value. Successful management depends on recognition of the supernormal caloric intake required to induce rapid catch-up growth. Aggressive hyperalimentation combined with intensive emotional stimulation and often with active family participation offer the best chances of a successful outcome.
回顾我们对为何有些儿童在无明显器质性病因的情况下生长发育不良的理解的时间演变,有助于我们制定一种合理的当代诊断和管理方法。最初它被认为是机构中儿童的一种现象,后来人们清楚地认识到它也可能发生在与家人生活在一起的儿童身上。虽然起初情感剥夺被强调为生长发育失败的主要决定因素,但现在很明显,主要的中介机制是热量摄入不足。因此,在营养恢复之前,可能很难区分儿童的情绪症状是营养不良的原因还是结果。除了极少数例外情况,可以根据病史、体格检查和家庭评估怀疑病因诊断。事实证明,对这类儿童进行非特异性调查筛查毫无价值。成功的管理取决于认识到促进快速追赶生长所需的超常热量摄入。积极的高营养支持结合强烈的情感刺激,并且通常有家庭的积极参与,提供了取得成功结果的最佳机会。