Faschingbauer T R, Johnson D T, Newmark C S
J Pers Assess. 1978 Feb;42(1):74-5. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4201_10.
Newmark, Conger, and Faschingbauer (1976) found a significant difference between mean ratings of MMPI and FAM (Faschingbauer's Abbreviated MMPI) based interpretations. Since this may have been specific to lack of rater experience, the present study attempted a replication using long-term psychotherapists as raters. The only significant difference was for 20 male psychiatric inpatients. Females (n = 16) and the pooled sample showed no significant differences between ratings regardless of the source test. When the present results are compared to those of Newmark, Conger and Faschinbauer (1976) and earlier work by Fashcinbauer (1973), it appears that the FAM yields interpretation as accurate as one would expect given its psychometric dissimilarity from the MMPI.
纽马克、康格和法申鲍尔（1976年）发现，基于明尼苏达多相人格测验（MMPI）和法申鲍尔简化明尼苏达多相人格测验（FAM）的解释的平均评分之间存在显著差异。由于这可能是评分者缺乏经验所特有的情况，本研究尝试以长期心理治疗师作为评分者进行重复实验。唯一显著的差异出现在20名男性精神病住院患者身上。女性（n = 16）以及合并样本在评分上无论依据何种原始测验均未显示出显著差异。当将本研究结果与纽马克、康格和法申鲍尔（1976年）以及法申鲍尔早期（1973年）的研究结果进行比较时，似乎鉴于FAM与MMPI在心理测量学上的差异，FAM所产生的解释准确性与预期相当。
