Moreland K L
J Pers Assess. 1984 Jun;48(3):265-70. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_7.
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) scales were used to predict psychiatric ratings in two male and two female groups of adult state psychiatric hospital inpatients. The resulting regression coefficients were cross-validated on the other same-sex group using MMPI, MMPI-168, and Faschingbauer Abbreviated MMPI (FAM) scales as predictors. The validity coefficients obtained in this manner were generally small and similar across MMPI forms. There was a trend for MMPI-based predictions to be superior to those of the short forms as the validity coefficients grew larger. This finding suggested caution in the use of the MMPI-168 and FAM as substitutes for the full MMPI. A suggestive for blending realism and rigor in future research is offered.
明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)量表被用于预测一家州立成人精神病医院两组男性和两组女性住院患者的精神科评定结果。使用MMPI、MMPI-168和法申鲍尔简化MMPI(FAM)量表作为预测指标,在另一组同性患者中对所得回归系数进行交叉验证。以这种方式获得的效度系数通常较小,且在不同的MMPI形式中相似。随着效度系数增大,基于MMPI的预测有优于简短形式预测的趋势。这一发现表明在使用MMPI-168和FAM替代完整MMPI时应谨慎。文中还为未来研究中融合现实性和严谨性提供了建议。