Chiang S J, Clowes R C
Mol Gen Genet. 1982;185(1):169-75. doi: 10.1007/BF00333809.
Inverse repeats of the transposon Tn2660 in either a ColE1 or an R6K replicon, with or without inversions of the parental DNA sequences between the repeats, show no detectable (less than 2%) evidence of recombination between the repeats after 60 generations of growth in either recA or RecA+ hosts. In contrast, attempts made to construct plasmids which carry two direct repeats by in vitro cleavage and ligation in the recA host were unsuccessful, although homologous plasmids with inverse repeats could be constructed, and other plasmids were found consistent with products of recombination between the direct repeats of the transient intermediate structure. It is concluded that in recA or recA+ hosts recombination between direct repeats of a transposon is frequent, whereas recombination between inverse repeats of a homologous structure has not been observed. A model to explain this difference depends upon a mechanisms that produces a nick in only one of the pair of strands at the internal resolution site (IRS) sequence of the transposon.
转座子Tn2660在ColE1或R6K复制子中的反向重复序列,无论重复序列之间的亲本DNA序列是否发生倒置,在recA或RecA+宿主中生长60代后,重复序列之间均未检测到(小于2%)重组迹象。相比之下,在recA宿主中通过体外切割和连接构建携带两个正向重复序列的质粒的尝试未成功,尽管可以构建具有反向重复序列的同源质粒,并且发现其他质粒与瞬时中间结构的正向重复序列之间的重组产物一致。结论是,在recA或RecA+宿主中,转座子的正向重复序列之间的重组很频繁,而同源结构的反向重复序列之间未观察到重组。一个解释这种差异的模型依赖于一种机制,该机制仅在转座子的内部分辨率位点(IRS)序列的一对链中的一条上产生一个切口。