Galli G, Maini C L, Salvatori M, Ausili Cefaro G
Nuklearmedizin. 1982 Aug;21(4):140-4.
The authors have reviewed their experiences in determining the presence of liver metastases in 103 patients by radiocolloid scanning. The sensitivity of liver scanning proved to be quite low if the presence of focal defects in the distribution of the tracer was chosen as the diagnostic criterion. The inclusion of less restrictive criteria such as liver enlargement or irregular distribution of the tracer, resulted in a higher sensitivity without lowering the predictive value of a negative scan. Using the latter diagnostic criterion, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were in the range of 90%. Abnormal liver scans are common in patients classified at T3-T4 or N+ and their chances of being "true positive" are high. Conversely, abnormal scans are seldom found in patients classified at T1-T2 or N0 and probabilities of "false positive" results are high.
作者回顾了他们通过放射性胶体扫描确定103例患者肝转移情况的经验。如果将示踪剂分布中的局灶性缺损作为诊断标准,肝脏扫描的敏感性相当低。纳入限制较少的标准,如肝脏肿大或示踪剂分布不规则,可提高敏感性,同时不降低阴性扫描的预测价值。采用后一种诊断标准,敏感性、特异性和准确性在90%的范围内。肝脏扫描异常在T3 - T4或N +分类的患者中很常见,其“真阳性”的可能性很高。相反,在T1 - T2或N0分类的患者中很少发现扫描异常,“假阳性”结果的概率很高。