Dorn A, Brauer D, Otto B, Fanning E, Knippers R
Eur J Biochem. 1982 Nov;128(1):53-62.
Two major subclasses of simian virus 40 tumor antigen were prepared from productively infected monkey cells. These subclasses can be distinguished by their sedimentation properties: one tumor antigen form sediments at 5-6S and the other at 14-16S. The DNA-binding properties of these subclasses were investigated by two different experimental procedures. In the first procedure, the DNA binding of subclasses of crude tumor antigen, separated by zone velocity sedimentation, were assayed by immunoprecipitation of the DNA-protein complexes. In the second procedure, the two tumor antigen forms were partially purified by column chromatography and DNA binding was tested in a filter binding assay. Both procedures gave comparable results. (a) The 5-6-S and the 14-16-S tumor antigen bound specifically to a DNA restriction fragment containing the viral genome control regions. (b) At low salt concentrations, both subclasses bound to specific and to nonspecific DNA sequences; competition experiments in the presence of nonspecific DNA showed, however, that the affinity of both tumor antigen forms for the viral genome control region was at least 10-fold higher than their affinity for nonspecific DNA sequences. (c) The binding of the 5-6-S subclass to viral control region DNA was optimal at 60-80 mM NaCl while specific DNA binding of the 14-16-S form was optimal at 150-200 mM NaCl; however, binding of the 14-16-S form to nonspecific DNA sequences was also more resistant to high salt concentrations than that of the 5-6S form. (d) Both tumor antigen forms bound well to specific and to nonspecific DNA at pH 6-6.5; with increasing pH values, binding to nonspecific DNA decreased while binding to specific DNA reached an optimum at pH 7-7.5. Binding of the 14-16-S form to viral origin DNA was more resistant to pH values above 7.5 than binding of the 5-6-S form.
从产生病毒的感染猴细胞中制备了猿猴病毒40肿瘤抗原的两个主要亚类。这些亚类可通过其沉降特性加以区分:一种肿瘤抗原形式沉降系数为5 - 6S,另一种为14 - 16S。通过两种不同的实验方法研究了这些亚类的DNA结合特性。在第一种方法中,通过区带速度沉降分离的粗肿瘤抗原亚类的DNA结合,通过DNA - 蛋白质复合物的免疫沉淀进行测定。在第二种方法中,两种肿瘤抗原形式通过柱色谱进行部分纯化,并在滤膜结合试验中测试DNA结合。两种方法得到了可比的结果。(a) 5 - 6S和14 - 16S肿瘤抗原特异性结合到一个含有病毒基因组控制区的DNA限制片段上。(b) 在低盐浓度下,两个亚类都结合到特异性和非特异性DNA序列上;然而,在非特异性DNA存在下的竞争实验表明,两种肿瘤抗原形式对病毒基因组控制区的亲和力比对非特异性DNA序列的亲和力至少高10倍。(c) 5 - 6S亚类与病毒控制区DNA的结合在60 - 80 mM NaCl时最佳,而14 - 16S形式的特异性DNA结合在150 - 200 mM NaCl时最佳;然而,14 - 16S形式与非特异性DNA序列的结合对高盐浓度的抗性也比5 - 6S形式更强。(d) 两种肿瘤抗原形式在pH 6 - 6.5时都能很好地结合到特异性和非特异性DNA上;随着pH值升高,与非特异性DNA的结合减少,而与特异性DNA的结合在pH 7 - 7.5时达到最佳。14 - 16S形式与病毒起始DNA的结合对pH值高于7.5的抗性比5 - 6S形式更强。