Lildholdt T
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1983;398:1-28. doi: 10.3109/00016488309105586.
The purpose of this study has been to evaluate the use of ventilation tubes in the treatment of cases of primary secretory otitis media. Bilateral cases were selected and a tube inserted in one ear while the other ear was left intact. Adenoidectomy was performed on all children, tonsillectomy in 34% of the cases. A total of 150 children (mean age = 3.9 years) were included during the years 1976-1979 and check-ups performed every 3-6 months. The follow-up rate was 89.3%. The condition of each individual was assessed after a 5-year period, the mean period of observation was 3.2 years. The results of tympanometry and audiometry from the two types of ears were, on average, similar. Repeat operation was carried out in 17% of the cases and later otomicroscopy revealed a higher incidence of atrophy in these eardrums (p less than 0.01). A period of suppuration was noted in 25% of the ears with a ventilation tube, 2 months or more after operation; a higher incidence of tympanosclerosis was later found (p = 0.02). Twentythree per cent of the treated eardrums were characterized at the final check-up as "normal" by means of otomicroscopy, in contrast to 83% of the intact ears. The "end-result" of each ear was estimated using tympanometry, audiometry as well as otomicroscopy, and a difference in favour of the intact ears was found (p less than 0.01). A similar estimate for each child gave the result that 31% had one ear categorized as "pathological" while this was the case in both ears of 9% of the children. The children subjected to initial tonsillectomy showed a worse "end-result" (p less than 0.05). It is concluded that the use of ventilation tubes in children with primary secretory otitis media is not justified. Observation has shown that only a small proportion will require surgical treatment of the middle ear. A ventilation tube may be indicated in order to combat hearing loss, but it should be borne in mind that its use involves a high risk of complications and sequelae which may result in chronic middle ear disease.
本研究的目的是评估通气管在原发性分泌性中耳炎病例治疗中的应用。选取双侧病例,在一只耳朵插入通气管,而另一只耳朵保持原状。所有儿童均进行了腺样体切除术,34%的病例进行了扁桃体切除术。在1976年至1979年期间共纳入150名儿童(平均年龄 = 3.9岁),每3至6个月进行一次检查。随访率为89.3%。在5年期间评估每个个体的状况,平均观察期为3.2年。两种类型耳朵的鼓室导抗图和听力测定结果平均相似。17%的病例进行了再次手术,后来的耳显微镜检查显示这些鼓膜萎缩的发生率较高(p < 0.01)。在插入通气管的耳朵中,25%在术后2个月或更长时间出现了一段化脓期;后来发现鼓室硬化的发生率较高(p = 0.02)。通过耳显微镜检查,在最后检查时,23%接受治疗的鼓膜被判定为“正常”,而未处理耳朵的这一比例为83%。使用鼓室导抗图、听力测定以及耳显微镜检查对每只耳朵的“最终结果”进行评估,发现未处理耳朵更具优势(p < 0.01)。对每个儿童进行类似评估的结果是,31%的儿童有一只耳朵被归类为“病理性”,而9%的儿童两只耳朵都是如此。最初接受扁桃体切除术的儿童显示出更差的“最终结果”(p < 0.05)。得出的结论是,在原发性分泌性中耳炎儿童中使用通气管是不合理的。观察表明,只有一小部分儿童需要进行中耳手术治疗。为了对抗听力损失可能需要插入通气管,但应牢记其使用涉及高并发症和后遗症风险,这可能导致慢性中耳疾病。