Pero R W, Jonsson G G, Persson L
Chem Biol Interact. 1983 Dec;47(3):265-75. doi: 10.1016/0009-2797(83)90162-x.
We have directly compared in resting human mononuclear leukocytes the DNA repair effects caused by ADP-ribosyl transferase (ADPRT) activity following DNA damage induction by gamma radiation, UV radiation, ethylene oxide (EO) and N-acetoxy-2-acetylaminofluorene (NA-AAF). The presence of inhibitors of ADPRT during the quantitation of unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) resulted in about a 2-fold increase of UDS when induced by gamma radiation, UV radiation or EO. The stimulation of UDS by EO, UV- or gamma-radiation in the presence of an ADPRT inhibitor was equally strong whether 1 mM or 10 mM hydroxyurea was used to suppress scheduled DNA synthesis. The level of NA-AAF induced UDS was not affected by inhibitors of ADPRT. In addition, direct estimation of ADPRT activity revealed that at doses giving maximal UDS, NA-AAF damage did not induce a measurable enzymatic activity whereas gamma-radiation, UV radiation and EO all showed a significant dose response increase. We have interpreted our data to mean that NA-AAF induced UDS estimates DNA repair relating mainly to DNA lesions that are recognized with difficulty, and hence, the rate of endonuclease-induced DNA strand break accumulation is not sufficient to allow a stimulation of ADPRT and affect the quantitation of UDS.
我们直接比较了在静息的人单核白细胞中,γ射线、紫外线、环氧乙烷(EO)和N-乙酰氧基-2-乙酰氨基芴(NA-AAF)诱导DNA损伤后,由ADP-核糖基转移酶(ADPRT)活性引起的DNA修复效应。在非预定DNA合成(UDS)定量过程中存在ADPRT抑制剂时,γ射线、紫外线或EO诱导的UDS增加了约2倍。无论使用1 mM还是10 mM羟基脲来抑制预定DNA合成,在ADPRT抑制剂存在下,EO、紫外线或γ射线对UDS的刺激同样强烈。NA-AAF诱导的UDS水平不受ADPRT抑制剂的影响。此外,对ADPRT活性的直接估计表明,在产生最大UDS的剂量下,NA-AAF损伤未诱导可测量的酶活性,而γ射线、紫外线和EO均显示出显著的剂量反应增加。我们对数据的解释是,NA-AAF诱导的UDS估计主要与难以识别的DNA损伤相关的DNA修复,因此,核酸内切酶诱导的DNA链断裂积累速率不足以刺激ADPRT并影响UDS的定量。